Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effects of common-sense model interventions on cancer patients: A systematic review.
Gu, Xue; Shen, Xia; Zhou, Jun-Rui; Chu, Jiang-Hui; Jiang, Lei.
Afiliación
  • Gu X; Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
  • Shen X; Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
  • Zhou JR; Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
  • Chu JH; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China.
  • Jiang L; Department of Radiology, Huadong Sanatorium, Wuxi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(17): e37777, 2024 Apr 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669411
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

From the time of new diagnosis to treatment, cancer patients experience a variety of health problems that can affect the patient's health outcomes. Individuals with cancer are being given increasing responsibility for the self-management of their health and illness. The self-regulating common-sense model (CSM) is effective in patients' disease management. This article briefly introduces the common-sense model intervention, in which patients with cancer are affected by these interventions, what they are about, and what effects they have.

METHODS:

The authors systematically review evidence for the common-sense model of self-regulation for cancer using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we searched the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, CNKI, and WanFang databases. The included studies underwent a quality assessment using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP).

RESULTS:

Eleven empirical studies illustrated the aspects of common-sense model interventions for cancer patients. It is concluded that common-sense model intervention has an effect on symptoms in cancer treatment, behavior, and quality of life, but more studies are needed to verify the use of common-sense model intervention to explore in patients with different cancers. The systematic review summarized a four-point paradigm about intervention content, including assessing the current situation, setting goals, having a disease education and psychological adjustment, and getting feedback for further response. However, the application of intervention requires specific analysis of patient behavior and outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Common-sense model interventions are beneficial for the self-management of cancer patients; however, more intervention studies are needed to specify the cognitive, emotional, and coping styles of people with a particular cancer.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos