Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis.
Wubben, Brandon M; Dandashi, Jad; Rizvi, Omar; Adhikari, Srikar.
Afiliación
  • Wubben BM; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ USA.
  • Dandashi J; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine Iowa City, IA USA.
  • Rizvi O; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ USA.
  • Adhikari S; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ USA.
POCUS J ; 9(1): 75-79, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681156
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Emergency physicians commonly perform ultrasound-assisted abdominal paracentesis, using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify ascites and select a site for needle insertion. However, ultrasound-guided paracentesis has the benefit of real-time needle visualization during the entire procedure. Our objective was to characterize the performance of emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided paracentesis using POCUS, their ability to achieve good in-plane needle visualization, and factors associated with procedural success.

METHODS:

A POCUS database was retrospectively reviewed for examinations where abdominal paracentesis was performed by an emergency physician at two academic urban emergency departments over a six-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, presenting history, complications, and hospital course. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data.

RESULTS:

131 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate for ultrasound-guided paracentesis was 97.7% (84/86 [95% CI 92-100%]) compared to 95.6% (43/45 [95% CI 85-99%]) for ultrasound-assisted paracentesis (p=0.503). 58% (50/86) demonstrated good in-plane needle visualization; 17% (15/86) had partial or out-of-plane visualization; and 24% (21/86) did not demonstrate needle visibility on their saved POCUS images. All four procedural failures were performed by first- or second-year residents using a curvilinear transducer, while all procedures using a linear transducer were successful. The most common complications were ascites leak, infection at the site, and minor bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS:

Emergency physicians with training in real-time needle guidance with ultrasound were able to use POCUS to perform ultrasound-guided paracentesis in the emergency department with a high success rate and no fatal complications. Based on our experience, we recommend performing ultrasound-guided paracentesis using a linear transducer, with attention to identifying vessels near the procedure site and maintaining sterile technique.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: POCUS J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: POCUS J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Canadá