Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-Density Porous Polyethylene Implant Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.
Perozzo, Filippo Andrea Giovanni; Ku, Ying C; Kshettry, Varun R; Sikder, Prabaha; Papay, Francis A; Rampazzo, Antonio; Bassiri Gharb, Bahar.
Afiliación
  • Perozzo FAG; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Ku YC; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Kshettry VR; Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Sikder P; Mechanical Engineering, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH.
  • Papay FA; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Rampazzo A; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
  • Bassiri Gharb B; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1074-1079, 2024 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682928
ABSTRACT
Porous polyethylene has been widely used in craniofacial reconstruction due to its biomechanical properties and ease of handling. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to summarize outcomes utilizing high-density porous polyethylene (HDPP) implants in cranioplasty. A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted to identify original studies with HDPP cranioplasty from inception to March 2023. Non-English articles, commentaries, absent indications or outcomes, and nonclinical studies were excluded. Data on patient demographics, indications, defect size and location, outcomes, and patient satisfaction were extracted. Summary statistics were calculated using weighted averages based on the available reported data. A total of 1089 patients involving 1104 cranioplasty procedures with HDPP were identified. Patients' mean age was 44.0 years (range 2 to 83 y). The mean follow-up duration was 32.0 months (range 2 wk to 8 y). Two studies comprising 17 patients (1.6%) included only pediatric patients. Alloplastic cranioplasty was required after treatment of cerebrovascular diseases (50.9%), tumor excision (32.0%), trauma (11.4%), trigeminal neuralgia/epilepsy (3.4%), and others such as abscesses/cysts (1.4%). The size of the defect ranged from 3 to 340 cm 2 . An overall postoperative complication rate of 2.3% was identified, especially in patients who had previously undergone surgery at the same site. When data were available, contour improvement and high patient satisfaction were reported in 98.8% and 98.3% of the patients. HDPP implants exhibit favorable outcomes for reconstruction of skull defects. Higher complication rates may be anticipated in secondary cranioplasty cases.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cráneo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Polietileno Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cráneo / Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica / Polietileno Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos