Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences in end-of-life care patterns between types of hospice used for cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Yun, Il; Park, Eun-Cheol; Nam, Chung Mo; Shin, Jaeyong; Jang, Suk-Yong; Jang, Sung-In.
Afiliación
  • Yun I; Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Park EC; Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Nam CM; Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin J; Department of Preventive Medicine & Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-to, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang SY; Department of Preventive Medicine & Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, 50-1 Yonsei-to, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang SI; Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 111, 2024 Apr 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689262
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In response to the rapid aging population and increasing number of cancer patients, discussions on dignified end-of-life (EoL) decisions are active around the world. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the differences in EoL care patterns between types of hospice used for cancer patients.

METHODS:

In this population-based cohort study, the Korean National Health Insurance Service cohort data containing all registered cancer patients who died between 2017 and 2021 were used. A total of 408,964 individuals were eligible for analysis. The variable of interest, the type of hospice used in the 6 months before death, was classified as follows (1) Non-hospice users; (2) Hospital-based hospice single users; (3) Home-based hospice single users; (4) Combined hospice users. The outcomes were set as patterns of care, including intense care and supportive care. To identify differences in care patterns between hospice types, a generalized linear model with zero-inflated negative binomial distribution was applied.

RESULTS:

Hospice enrollment was associated with less intense care and more supportive care near death. Notably, those who used combined hospice care had the lowest probability and frequency of receiving intense care (aOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.17-0.19, aRR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44-0.49), while home-based hospice single users had the highest probability and frequency of receiving supportive care (Prescription for narcotic analgesics, aOR 2.95, 95% CI 2.69-3.23, aRR 1.45, 95% CI 1.41-1.49; Mental health care, aOR 3.40, 95% CI 3.13-3.69, aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.31-1.39).

CONCLUSION:

Our findings suggest that although intense care for life-sustaining decreases with hospice enrollment, QoL at the EoL actually improves with appropriate supportive care. This study is meaningful in that it not only offers valuable insight into hospice care for terminally ill patients, but also provides policy implications for the introduction of patient-centered community-based hospice services.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidado Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida / Neoplasias Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidado Terminal / Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida / Neoplasias Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: BMC Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido