Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The equation for medical multiple-choice question testing time estimation.
Kreepala, Chatchai; Keeratibharat, Nattawut; Aekgawong, Sekdusit; Wattanavaekin, Krittanont; Danjittrong, Taechasit; Juntararuangtong, Thitikorn; Chombandit, Theetad.
Afiliación
  • Kreepala C; School of Internal Medicine.
  • Keeratibharat N; School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima.
  • Aekgawong S; School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima.
  • Wattanavaekin K; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
  • Danjittrong T; Department of Anesthesiology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Juntararuangtong T; School of Internal Medicine.
  • Chombandit T; School of Internal Medicine.
Ann Med Surg (Lond) ; 86(5): 2688-2695, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694350
ABSTRACT
Introduction and importance Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) offer a suitable means to assess the cognitive domain of learners with a high degree of objectivity. The study's objective is to formulate an equation for determining the ideal timing for MCQ examinations, thereby inspiring the development of a model to estimate the duration of these examinations.

Methods:

The authors generated a specific computer program that integrated with the operating system of the examination. Technical-specific features included the ability to calculate the speed of students taking examinations with images or videos in the questions or options. This bespoke computer program was designed specifically for assessing individual students' MCQ test-taking pace and generating a proctor report in a computer-readable format. Subsequently, data derived from this program underwent regression analysis to determine the speed at which students completed MCQ examinations.

Outcomes:

The data were collected from a total of 1035 examinees, all of whom were non-native English speakers. The average reading rate was 62.38±20.4 words/min. It was found that the rate decreased significantly in difficult (50.65±6.9 words/min) items compared to easy (82.29±21.3 words/min) and intermediate (60.56±19.1 words/min) items (p<0.001), respectively. The linear regression analysis predicted option selection (words/min) as; 33.92+1.93(%tables/figures)+0.14(%recall)-0.37(%application), r2=0.45, p<0.001.

Conclusion:

It is not advisable to base the decision solely on reading time or time allocation. Examination administrators are advised to proactively plan ahead, with particular emphasis on establishing a well-defined taxonomy, as it constitutes a fundamental cornerstone in the utilization of the estimation equation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido