Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tobacco Quitline utilization compared with cigarette smoking prevalence in Virginia across rurality and Appalachian Status, 2011-2019.
Pilehvari, Asal; Krukowski, Rebecca Anne; Wiseman, Kara Philips; Little, Melissa Ashley.
Afiliación
  • Pilehvari A; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Krukowski RA; UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Wiseman KP; Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Little MA; UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Prev Med Rep ; 42: 102716, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707246
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

While cigarette smoking rates have declined, rural and Appalachian populations in the United States have not seen similar decreases. Quitline programs are promising strategies in reducing disparities in these areas, but research on their usage is limited.

Methods:

We employed Small Area Estimation on the Virginia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2011-2019) to estimate county-level smoking prevalence and utilized The Quit Now Virginia Quitline data (2011-2019) to estimate Quitline users. We analyzed differences in Quitline utilization by rurality and Appalachian status using statistical t-tests. Stepwise regression assessed the absolute estimate of county features, including poverty rate, tobacco retailer density, physician availability, coal mining industry, and tobacco agriculture, on Quitline usage.

Results:

While the average smoking rate overall was 15.3 %, only 7.4 % of smokers accessed Quitline services from 2011 to 2019. Appalachian regions exhibited higher smoking rates (20.9 %) and lower quitline usage (4.8 %) compared to non-Appalachian areas (14 % smoking prevalence, 8 % quitline usage). Rural regions had higher smoking prevalence (19.0 %) than urban areas (12.9 %), but no significant difference in Quitline utilization (7.6 % vs. 7.2 %, p = 0.7). Stepwise regression revealed counties with more tobacco agriculture had 3.2 % (p = 0.04) lower Quitline utilization. Also, more physicians availability in the county was associated with 3.9 % higher Quitline usage (p = 0.03) and Appalachian counties exhibited a 3.6 % lower Quitline usage rate compared to non-Appalachian counties.

Conclusion:

A significant gap exists between cigarette smoking prevalence and Quitline utilization, particularly in underserved rural and Appalachian areas, despite no clear barriers to accessing this remote cessation resource. Implication The study underscores persistent disparities in smoking rates, with rural and Appalachian regions in the United States facing higher smoking prevalence and limited utilization of Quitline services. Despite no clear barriers to access, the gap between smoking prevalence and Quitline usage remains significant, particularly in underserved areas. Tailoring interventions to address regional disparities and factors like tobacco agriculture and physician availability is essential to reduce smoking rates and improve Quitline utilization in these communities.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos