Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Update on chelating agents in endodontic treatment: A systematic review.
Fortea, Laura; Sanz-Serrano, Diana; Luz, Luciana-Batista; Bardini, Giulia; Mercade, Montse.
Afiliación
  • Fortea L; Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
  • Sanz-Serrano D; Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
  • Luz LB; Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Bardini G; Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Mercade M; Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
J Clin Exp Dent ; 16(4): e516-e538, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725809
ABSTRACT

Background:

The aim of this review was to assess the evidence regarding the most commonly used chelating agents in terms of efficacy, erosive potential, cytotoxicity, interaction, antimicrobial effect, impact on sealers adhesion, and release of growth factors. Material and

Methods:

MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched up to January 14, 2023, including studies with one or more of the following chelating agents 17% EDTA, 9% and 18% HEDP, 10% and 20% citric acid, 2%-2.25% peracetic acid and 7% maleic acid. In addition, the reference lists of all selected articles were also checked to identify additional relevant studies. Articles published in English and available in full-text were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified CONSORT checklist guide and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

Results:

The electronic search yielded 538 citations, 56 of which were included. The articles included had moderate and low evidence values. Among 56 articles included, 55 were in vitro studies and one was a randomized clinical trial. Among the in vitro studies, 15 evaluated efficacy and dentin erosion, 12 evaluated interaction with other endodontic irrigants, 9 tested antimicrobial effect, 4 evaluated cytotoxicity in hamster and rat lung cells, 9 evaluated intervention in adhesion of filling materials and 8 focused on release of growth factors and on behavior of stem cells in regenerative endodontic. The RCT tested antimicrobial effect.

Conclusions:

17% EDTA is the most effective in smear layer removal and in releasing growth factors on regenerative endodontics. However, the current incorporation of 9% and 18% etidronic acid has shown optimal results due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its capability on avoiding smear layer formation through a continuous chelation action. Despite these preliminary findings, methodological standardization between studies is required and in vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro studies. Key wordsChelating Agents, Smear Layer, Systematic Review, Endodontics, Root Canal Irrigants.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Exp Dent Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Exp Dent Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: España