Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of manual segmentation strategies and different phases selection on machine learning-based computed tomography in renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Song, Honghao; Wang, Xiaoqing; Wu, Rongde; Liu, Wei.
Afiliación
  • Song H; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang X; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwu Street, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
  • Wu R; Post-doctoral Research Station of Clinical Medicine, Liaocheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng, 252004, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
  • Liu W; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jingwu Street, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Radiol Med ; 129(7): 1025-1037, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Delineating the region/volume of interest (ROI/VOI) and selecting the phases are of importance in developing machine learning (ML). The results will change when choosing different methods of drawing the ROI/VOI and selecting different phases. However, there is no related standard for delineating the ROI/VOI and selecting the phases in renal tumors to develop ML based on computed tomography (CT).

METHODS:

The PubMed and Web of Science were searched for related studies published until March 1, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies that developed ML models in renal tumors from CT images. And the binary diagnostic accuracy data were extracted to obtain the outcomes, such as sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS:

Twenty-three papers were included in the meta-analysis with a pooled SE of 87% (95% CI 85-88%), SP of 82% (95% CI 79-85%), and AUC of 91% (95% CI 89-93%) in phases; a pooled SE of 82% (95% CI 80-84%), SP of 85% (95% CI 83-86%), and AUC of 90% (95% CI 88-93%) in phases combined with delineating strategies, respectively. In all different combinations, the contour-focused and single phase produce the highest AUC of 93% (95% CI 90-95%). In subgroup analyses (sample size, year of publication, and geographical distribution), the performance was acceptable on phases and phases combined strategies.

CONCLUSIONS:

To explore the effect of manual segmentation strategies and different phases selection on ML-based CT, we find that the method of single phase (CMP or NP) combined with contour-focused was considered a better strategy compared to the other strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Aprendizaje Automático / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Aprendizaje Automático / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiol Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article