Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified Implant Fixation Technique Is an Alternative for Patients with an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Limited Resource Settings: A Comparison Functional Outcome Study with Polyether Ether Ketone and Bioabsorbable Screws.
Sakti, Muhammad; Wawolumaja, Arian Fardin Ignatius; Saleh, Ruksal; Usman, Muhammad Andry; Arifin, Jainal; Johan, Muhammad Phetrus.
Afiliación
  • Sakti M; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
  • Wawolumaja AFI; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
  • Saleh R; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
  • Usman MA; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
  • Arifin J; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
  • Johan MP; Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia.
J Clin Med ; 13(10)2024 May 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792505
ABSTRACT

Background:

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most prevalent factors contributing to knee instability worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate modified metal fixation techniques for ACL reconstruction compared to factory-made implants, such as polyether ether ketone (PEEK) screws, bioabsorbable screws, and modified metal implants.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted to assess the functional outcomes of ACL using various fixation methods. Patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction at several healthcare facilities were included in the study. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score questionnaire at 6- and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analyses, including the Shapiro-Wilk test and analysis of variance, were performed to compare outcomes among the fixation groups.

Results:

Thirty-three patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with varying distributions across the three fixation groups (modified metal implants, PEEK screws, and bioabsorbable screws) were included in the study. As measured by the Lysholm and IKDC scores at 6- and 12 months post-surgery, the PEEK group demonstrated the highest average scores. Nevertheless, these functional outcomes were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.140, 0.770, 0.150, and 0.200). These findings align with those of meta-analyses comparing different fixation methods for ACL reconstruction.

Conclusions:

While acknowledging the small sample size as a limitation, this study suggests that modified metal implants represent viable options for ACL reconstruction. The selection of fixation methods should consider patient characteristics and preferences, emphasizing biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore their biomechanical properties and cost-effectiveness.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Indonesia Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Indonesia Pais de publicación: Suiza