Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sociodemographic representation in randomized controlled trials for anxiety-related disorders in the U.S.: A systematic review (1993-2023).
Ong, Clarissa W; Skolnik, Alexa M; Johnson, Hannah M; Krafft, Jennifer; Loew, Sarah; Kurtz, Andrew J; Lee, Eric B.
Afiliación
  • Ong CW; Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, USA. Electronic address: clarissa.ong@utoledo.edu.
  • Skolnik AM; Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, USA.
  • Johnson HM; Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, USA.
  • Krafft J; Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, USA.
  • Loew S; Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, USA.
  • Kurtz AJ; Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, USA.
  • Lee EB; Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, USA.
Clin Psychol Rev ; 111: 102446, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796946
ABSTRACT
Cognitive behavioral therapies have been identified as evidence-based treatments for anxiety-related disorders. However, data supporting the effectiveness of these treatments have been largely collected from participants with majoritized identities, potentially limiting the extent to which they can be considered "evidence-based" for clients from minoritized groups. The current review examined sociodemographic representation and quality of sociodemographic reporting in randomized controlled trials for anxiety-related disorders in the U.S. between 1993 and 2023. We conducted a systematic literature review of U.S.-based randomized controlled trials of cognitive behavioral therapies for anxiety-related disorders, extracted data on sociodemographic variables, and rated quality of reporting. Data from 55 eligible studies (N = 4492) indicated that white and female identities were overrepresented relative to the U.S. population, with variables like disability status, sexual orientation, and religious identification consistently ignored. In addition, quality of reporting was generally poor (mean = 3.6 out of 10), with many studies failing to account for demographic variables in their analyses or description of study limitations. Publication year, sample size, and NIH funding status did not significantly predict gender representation (% women), ethnoracial representation (% white), or quality of reporting. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating to whom "evidence-based" treatments apply and increasing diversity of clinical samples, to ensure that evidence-based treatments are inclusive. Recommendations for future research, clinical implications, and limitations are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Ansiedad / Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Rev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Ansiedad / Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Psychol Rev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article