Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.
Dorey, Trevor; Parmiter, Sara; Sanders, Jamie; Turcotte, Justin; Jeyabalan, Geetha.
Afiliación
  • Dorey T; Luminis Health - Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
  • Parmiter S; Luminis Health - Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
  • Sanders J; Department of Vascular Surgery, MedStar Health, Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
  • Turcotte J; Luminis Health - Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
  • Jeyabalan G; Luminis Health - Anne Arundel Medical Center, Annapolis, MD, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; : 15385744241257153, 2024 May 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797875
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is growing in popularity. Although major clinical end-points such as stroke rate and mortality are well-known, patient reported outcomes such as pain, and length of stay are among the purported benefits that are as yet untested. We sought to determine if there are differences in pain and other clinical outcomes when comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and TCAR.

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective review of 326 patients undergoing TCAR (n = 50) or CEA (n = 276) from 2019-2023. Primary outcomes of interest were maximum pain numeric rating scales (NRS) reported in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and on postoperative days (POD) zero and 1, and oral morphine milligram equivalents (OMMEs) received intraoperatively through POD1. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), complications, and 30-day emergency department (ED) returns/readmissions.

RESULTS:

Fifty TCAR and 150 CEA patients were included in the propensity score matched cohorts. TCAR patients reported lower pain-NRS in PACU (P < .001) and on POD0 (P = .002), but similar pain scores on POD1 (P = .112). Postoperatively, TCAR patients were less likely to receive opioids (52% vs 75.3%, P = .003) and received less OMME from PACU through POD1 (12.8 ± 16.2 vs 23.2 ± 27.2, P = .001). After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, prior chronic opioid use, and prior carotid surgery, TCAR patients were approximately 70% less likely to receive post-operative opioids. No significant differences in LOS, 30-day ED returns/readmissions, or complications were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with CEA, patients undergoing TCAR reported lower pain scores and consumed fewer narcotics overall. However, the absolute difference was modest, and pain scores were low in both cohorts. Differences in pain and post-operative narcotic use may be of less importance when deciding between TCAR and CEA. Total non-opioid protocols may be feasible in both approaches.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vasc Endovascular Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Vasc Endovascular Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos