Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bleeding risk from anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma: a MarketScan analysis.
Adrianzen-Herrera, Diego; Giorgio, Katherine; Walker, Rob F; Sparks, Andrew D; Gergi, Mansour; Zakai, Neil A; Lutsey, Pamela L.
Afiliación
  • Adrianzen-Herrera D; Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Giorgio K; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Walker RF; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  • Sparks AD; Biomedical Statistics Research Core, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Gergi M; Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Zakai NA; Department of Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
  • Lutsey PL; Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost ; 8(4): 102418, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798793
ABSTRACT

Background:

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulant prophylaxis is frequently recommended but underutilized partly due to the absence of studies assessing bleeding risk.

Objectives:

To determine the rate of severe (hospitalized) bleeding from thromboprophylaxis in patients treated for MM and identify clinical risk factors for bleeding in this population.

Methods:

Using the MarketScan database, we analyzed 6656 patients treated for MM between 2013 and 2021. Concomitant thromboprophylaxis was defined using prescription claims. Hospitalized bleeding was identified through the Cunningham algorithm. Bleeding rates were compared by thromboprophylaxis status, and Cox regression identified risk factors for bleeding.

Results:

Anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis was used in 6.6% (436) patients treated for MM. Patients on thromboprophylaxis had a higher rate of immunomodulatory-based therapy (63.8% vs 46.7%; P < .01) and lower rate of antiplatelet use (2.1% vs 4.7%; P < .01). Bleeding occurred in 1.4% of them during median follow-up of 1.3 years. Rate of severe bleeding was not different between those on prophylaxis (7.8 per 1000 person-years) and those not on prophylaxis (10.1 per 1000 person-years). No association was identified between thromboprophylaxis and bleeding. Factors associated with increased bleeding included age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 per 10 years increase in age), comorbidity index (HR, 1.18 per SD increase), history of bleeding (HR, 1.54), hypertension (HR, 1.87), and renal disease (HR, 1.56).

Conclusion:

Risk of serious bleeding from thromboprophylaxis in patients treated for MM was low, and concomitant anticoagulant therapy did not result in increased bleeding risk. Clinical risk factors for bleeding included age, comorbidity index, bleeding history, hypertension, and renal disease.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos