Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Varicose Vein Education and Informed coNsent (VVEIN) Study: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Study.
Kiernan, Aoife; Boland, Fiona; Naughton, Peter; Moneley, Daragh; Doyle, Frank; Harkin, Denis W.
Afiliación
  • Kiernan A; Strategic Academic Research (StAR) Programme, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Bon Secours Health System, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: aoifekiernan.ak@gmail.com.
  • Boland F; Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Naughton P; Department of Vascular Surgery, Bon Secours Health System, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Moneley D; Department of Vascular Surgery, Bon Secours Health System, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Doyle F; Department of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Harkin DW; Strategic Academic Research (StAR) Programme, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Vascular Surgery, Bon Secours Health System, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Medical Professionalism, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 142-151, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810723
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of introducing a digital health education tool (dHET) for varicose vein surgery.

METHODS:

This randomized, feasibility study allocated 40 patients, into dHET (n = 20) or standard consent (SC) (n = 20) groups. Primary outcomes were related to feasibility. Secondary outcomes were knowledge recall, anxiety, and satisfaction.

RESULTS:

Recruitment and retention rates were 100% and 97.5%, respectively. Acceptability was also rated high, confirming feasibility. There was also no evidence of a difference between groups for early knowledge recall (14 [12-17] vs. 14 [11-16]; P = 0.72) or delayed (at 2 weeks) knowledge recall (15 [13-16] vs. 15 [13-16]; P = 0.89). The dHET module took significantly longer to complete compared to SC (13 min [12-18] vs. 9 min [8-12]; P < 0.01). However, the control group asked significantly more questions about the intended procedure (P = 0.03). There was no evidence of a difference between groups for patient anxiety or satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

This trial shows that the addition of a dHET is feasible and noninferior to SC. Digital consent provides a unique opportunity to promote patient education and autonomy for better shared decision making. It also offers better documentation of the consent process.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Várices / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares / Estudios de Factibilidad / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Satisfacción del Paciente / Consentimiento Informado Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Várices / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares / Estudios de Factibilidad / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Satisfacción del Paciente / Consentimiento Informado Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Vasc Surg Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos