Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-dimensional volumetric assessment and stability of simultaneously placed implant following sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized human demineralized tooth matrix or deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Paetnukroh, Nattha; Leepong, Narit; Suttapreyasri, Srisurang.
Afiliación
  • Paetnukroh N; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90112, Songkhla, Thailand.
  • Leepong N; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90112, Songkhla, Thailand. narit.l@psu.ac.th.
  • Suttapreyasri S; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90112, Songkhla, Thailand. srisurang.s@psu.ac.th.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 28(3): 1353-1363, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814505
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to analyze and compare three-dimensional volumetric bone changes and stability of simultaneously placed dental implants following sinus augmentation using deproteinized human demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM).

METHODS:

Twenty-four patients who required lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous dental implant placement were randomly assigned to receive either dpDTM (n = 12) or DBBM (n = 12). Cone-beam computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis of implant stability were conducted immediately after surgery and 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the graft sinus floor and graft height volumes in the sagittal and coronal views, along with the implant stability quotient (ISQ), were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS:

Volumetric graft alteration was comparable between dpDTM (120.33 ± 77.48 mm3) and DBBM (108.51 ± 65.15 mm3) (p = 0.690). Reduction in the average graft height was also comparable dpDTM group ranged from - 0.59 to - 0.93 mm and the DBBM group ranged from - 0.55 to - 0.82 mm (p > 0.05) at most examined levels. However, greater reduction in the mesial-graft height occurred in the dpDTM group (- 1.08 ± 0.70 mm vs. -0.58 ± 0.39 mm, p = 0.04). The ISQ values increased similarly in both groups to reach 70 at 6 months.

CONCLUSION:

dpDTM demonstrated comparable stability in graft volume and height during the healing process compared to DBBM and could serve as a viable alternative to DBBM for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagenología Tridimensional / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar Límite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oral Maxillofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagenología Tridimensional / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar Límite: Adult / Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Oral Maxillofac Surg Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia Pais de publicación: Alemania