Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How much online pornography is too much? A comparison of two theoretically distinct assessment scales.
Vera Cruz, Germano; Aboujaoude, Elias; Liberacka-Dwojak, Magdalena; Wilkosc-Debczynska, Monika; Rochat, Lucien; Khan, Riaz; Khazaal, Yasser.
Afiliación
  • Vera Cruz G; Department of Psychology, CRP-CPO, University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France. germano.vera.cruz@u-picardie.fr.
  • Aboujaoude E; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. eaboujaoude@stanford.edu.
  • Liberacka-Dwojak M; Program in Internet, Health and Society, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. eaboujaoude@stanford.edu.
  • Wilkosc-Debczynska M; Department of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Rochat L; Department of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Khan R; Department of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Specialized Facility in Behavioral Addiction ReConnecte, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Khazaal Y; Department of Mental Health and Psychiatry, Frontier Medical College Abbottabad, Bahria University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Arch Public Health ; 82(1): 79, 2024 May 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816773
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Online pornography use, an ever more common activity, has raised myriad psychosocial and clinical concerns. While there is a need to screen for and measure its problematic dimension, there is a debate about the adequacy of existing assessment tools.

OBJECTIVE:

The study compares two instruments for measuring pathological online pornography use (POPU) that are based on different theoretical frameworks-one in line with DSM-5 criteria and the six-component addiction model and one in line with ICD-11 criteria.

METHODS:

An international sample of 1,823 adults (Mean age = 31.66, SD = 6.74) answered an online questionnaire that included the Short Version of the Problematic Pornography Consumption Scale (PPCS-6) and the Assessment of Criteria for Specific Internet-Use Disorders (ACSID-11). Factorial, correlational, and network analyses were conducted on the data.

RESULTS:

Both tools adequately screened for online "addictive" behavior, but the ACSID-11 was superior in assessing the degree of clinical risk.

CONCLUSION:

Depending on the specific aim of the assessment (screening vs. clinical diagnostics), both online pornography measurement tools may be useful.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Public Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Public Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia