Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Balance, Landing Biomechanics, and Functional Movement Screen Characteristics With and Without Knee Exoskeleton in Military Soldiers.
Nagai, Takashi; Zeppetelli, David J; Sarantos, Lucas C; Johnson, Caleb D; Borden, Charles Joseph B; Dempsey, Cole A; Ramirez, Vanessa.
Afiliación
  • Nagai T; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Zeppetelli DJ; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Sarantos LC; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Johnson CD; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Borden CJB; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Dempsey CA; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
  • Ramirez V; Military Performance Division, United States Army Research Institute and Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760, USA.
Mil Med ; 2024 Jun 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38829165
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A light-weight pneumatic-powered knee exoskeleton could augment mobility and lifting capabilities for a variety of occupational settings. However, added weight/bulkiness and artificially produced knee extension torque could compromise sensorimotor characteristics. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Ten healthy participants conducted 3 visits within 10 days to the biomechanics laboratory. Participants were asked to complete the following tasks on each visit single-leg balance, single-leg drop-landing, and select functional movement tasks. Balance characteristics (the ground reaction forces variability and center-of-pressure velocity) were derived from force plates while knee flexion angles during drop-landing and functional movement tasks were captured using a motion capture system. Descriptive statistics as well as paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare between conditions. Significance was set at P < .05 a priori.

RESULTS:

During single-leg balance, the ground reaction force variabilities were significantly increased (P = .013-.019) and the center of pressure velocity was decreased (P = .001-.017) when wearing knee exoskeleton. During single-leg drop-landing, the exoskeleton condition showed lower knee flexion angles at the initial contact (P = .004-.021) and peak (P = .006-.010). Additionally, the peak vertical ground reaction force was higher in the exoskeleton condition (P = .007). During functional movement tasks, the exoskeleton condition showed less knee flexion range-of-motion during the overhead squat (P = .007-.033) and hurdle step-over (P = .004-.005).

CONCLUSIONS:

Participants exhibited stiffer landing technique with the exoskeleton. Given that these compromised sensorimotor characteristics have been associated with musculoskeletal injury risk, modifications to exoskeletons to promote softer landing and greater knee flexion range-of-motion during dynamic activities may be warranted.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Mil Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos