Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation.
Fukushi, Kahori; Monna-Oiwa, Maki; Kato, Seiko; Isobe, Masamichi; Kuroda, Seiichiro; Nannya, Yasuhito; Takahashi, Satoshi; Konuma, Takaaki.
Afiliación
  • Fukushi K; Department of Pharmacy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Monna-Oiwa M; Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kato S; Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Isobe M; Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kuroda S; Department of Pharmacy, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nannya Y; Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Takahashi S; Division of Clinical Precision Research Platform, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Konuma T; Department of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Blood Cell Ther ; 7(2): 41-48, 2024 May 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38854401
ABSTRACT
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; P < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; P = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Cell Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Blood Cell Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón