Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes After Exoscopic Versus Microscopic Type 1 Tympanoplasty.
Fan, Caleb J; Fritz, Christian G; Lucas, Jacob C; Conway, Robert M; Kato, Masanari G; Babu, Seilesh C.
Afiliación
  • Fan CJ; Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  • Fritz CG; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lucas JC; Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  • Conway RM; Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  • Kato MG; Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
  • Babu SC; Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(6): 671-675, 2024 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865726
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To analyze the outcomes of exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING:

Tertiary care otology-neurotology practice. PATIENTS Adult subjects with a diagnosis of tympanic membrane perforation from 2018 to 2022. INTERVENTION Exoscopic or microscopic tympanoplasty with cartilage + perichondrium or perichondrium/fascia graft. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Primary outcomes were graft success rate (1 wk, 3 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo postoperatively) and operative time. Secondary outcomes included audiometric outcomes of postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), change in ABG, pure tone average (PTA), speech reception threshold (SRT), and word recognition score (WRS) at 6-month follow-up and complication rates of cerebrospinal fluid leak, facial nerve injury, persistent tinnitus, and persistent vertigo.

RESULTS:

Seventy-one patients underwent type 1 tympanoplasty by a single surgeon. Thirty-six patients underwent exoscopic tympanoplasty, and 35 patients underwent microscopic tympanoplasty. Cartilage and perichondrium were utilized in 27 subjects (75.0%) in the exoscopic group and in 25 subjects (71.4%) in the microscopic group (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.04). Graft success rate was as follows (exoscope versus microscope) 100% (36/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 1 week (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.0), 97.2% (35/36) versus 100% (35/35) at 3 weeks (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.1), 97.2% (35/36) versus 94.3% (33/35) at 3 months (p = 1.0, Cramer's V = 0.07), and 91.7% (33/36) versus 91.4% (32/35) at 6 months (p = 0.7, Cramer's V = 0.0). Operative time was 57.7 minutes for the exoscopic group and 65.4 minutes for the microscopic group (p = 0.08, 95% CI [-16.4, 0.9], Cohen's d = 0.4). There were no serious complications. All preoperative and postoperative audiometric outcomes were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS:

The outcomes after exoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty are comparable.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Timpanoplastia / Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Otol Neurotol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Timpanoplastia / Perforación de la Membrana Timpánica Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Otol Neurotol Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: EEUU / ESTADOS UNIDOS / ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA / EUA / UNITED STATES / UNITED STATES OF AMERICA / US / USA