Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of factors associated with positive surgical margins and the five-year survival rate after prostate cancer resection and predictive modeling.
Li, Kai; Zhang, Yantao; Tian, Sinan; Su, Qingguo; Mei, Yanhui; Shi, Wei; Cao, Jingyuan; Song, Lijuan.
Afiliación
  • Li K; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Tian S; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Su Q; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Mei Y; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Shi W; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Cao J; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
  • Song L; Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, China.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1360404, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38903708
ABSTRACT

Background:

This study analyzed the risk factors associated with positive surgical margins (PSM) and five-year survival after prostate cancer resection to construct a positive margin prediction model.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 148 patients treated with prostatectomy. The patients were divided into PSM group and Negative surgical margins (NSM) group. Several parameters were compared between the groups. All patients were followed up for 60 months. The risk factors for PSM and five-year survival were evaluated by univariate analysis, followed by multifactorial dichotomous logistic regression analysis. Finally, ROC curves were plotted for the risk factors to establish a predictive model for PSM after prostate cancer resection.

Results:

(1) Serum PSA, percentage of positive puncture stitches, clinical stage, surgical approach, Gleason score on puncture biopsy, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with the risk of PSM (P < 0.05). Serum PSA, perineural invasion, Gleason score on puncture biopsy, and percentage of positive puncture stitches were independent risk factors for PSM. (2) Total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) by puncture, nutritional status, lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, and seminal vesicle invasion may be risk factors for five-year survival. Lymph node metastasis and nutritional status were the main risk factors for the five-year survival of patients with prostate cancer. (3) After plotting the ROC curve, the area under the curve (AUC) [AUC 0.776, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.725 to 0.854] was found to be a valid predictor of PSM; the AUC [AUC 0.664, 95%, confidence interval (CI) 0.576 to 0.753] was also a valid predictor of five-year survival (P < 0.05). (4) The scoring system had a standard error of 0.02 and a cut-off value of 6. It predicted PSM after prostate cancer resection with moderate efficacy.

Conclusions:

Serum PSA, perineural invasion, puncture biopsy Gleason score, and percentage of positive puncture stitches were independent risk factors for positive surgical margins (PSM). Also, lymph node metastasis and nutritional status were the main risk factors for the five-year survival of patients with prostate cancer. Overall, the prediction efficacy of this scoring system concerning the risk of PSM after prostate cancer resection was moderate.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China