Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.
Wang, Zi; Zhang, Dongzhe; Zhang, Zepei; Miao, Jun.
Afiliación
  • Wang Z; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Zhang D; Department of Spine Surgery, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM, Cangzhou, China.
  • Zhang Z; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
  • Miao J; Department of Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(25): e38431, 2024 Jun 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905365
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The research focused on the postoperative effect of using interbody fusion cage in lumbar posterior lamina decompression and interbody fusion with pedicle screw by comparing the postoperative effect of using 3D printing (Ti6Al4V) and PEEK material interbody fusion cage.

METHODS:

Ninety-one patients with lumbar degenerative diseases from the Department of Spine Surgery of Tianjin Hospital were included in the study cohort. They were divided into 3D group (n = 39) and PEEK group (n = 52) according to the use of interbody fusion cage. The imaging data of the patients were collected and the postoperative data of the 2 groups were compared to evaluate patients' health status and the recovery of lumbar structure and function after operation.

RESULTS:

Combined with the degree of fusion, the clinical effect of 3D printing titanium alloy interbody fusion cage was comprehensively judged. At the last follow-up, the JOA score, ODI index, VAS, prolo function score, and SF-36 scale of the 2 groups showed that the clinical symptoms were better than those before operation (P < .05). The height of intervertebral disc, the area of intervertebral foramen and the physiological curvature of lumbar vertebrae increased in varying degrees after operation (P < .05). At the last follow-up, the vertebral cage fusion rates were as high as 89.13% and 90.91% in the 3D and PEEK groups, with collapse rates of 6.5% and 4.5%, respectively. There were 10 cases of cage displacement in 3D group and 7 cases of cage displacement in PEEK group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

In conclusion, 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cage can obtain good clinical effect in the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Posterior lumbar lamina decompression, bilateral pedicle screw fixation combined with 3D printed cage interbody fusion is excellent in rebuilding the stability of lumbar vertebrae. 3D printed interbody fusion cage can be an ideal substitute material for intervertebral bone grafting. The stable fusion time of interbody fusion cage after lumbar fusion is mostly from 3 months to half a year after operation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Titanio / Aleaciones / Impresión Tridimensional / Vértebras Lumbares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fusión Vertebral / Titanio / Aleaciones / Impresión Tridimensional / Vértebras Lumbares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicine (Baltimore) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos