Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of a comprehensive disability measure: Disability prevalence among US Veterans and non-veterans from the National Health Interview Survey Data from 2015 to 2018.
Mulcahy, Abigail C; Govier, Diana J; Than, Claire T; Chawla, Neetu; Danan, Elisheva; Hooker, Elizabeth R; McCready, Holly; Hoggatt, Katherine J; Yano, Elizabeth M; Hynes, Denise M.
Afiliación
  • Mulcahy AC; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • Govier DJ; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • Than CT; National Precision Oncology Program, VHA Specialty Care Services, United States of America.
  • Chawla N; VA Health Systems Research (HSR) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
  • Danan E; VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America; Division of General Internal Medicine, Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United Sta
  • Hooker ER; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Oregon Health and Sciences University/Portland State University School of Public Health, United States of America.
  • McCready H; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America.
  • Hoggatt KJ; San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
  • Yano EM; VA Health Systems Research (HSR) Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, United States of America; Department of Health Policy & Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, C
  • Hynes DM; Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States of America; Health Management and Policy, College of Health & Center for Quantitative Life Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America; School of Nurs
Prev Med ; 185: 108051, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38906274
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current measures of condition-specific disabilities or those capturing only severe limitations may underestimate disability prevalence, including among Veterans.

OBJECTIVES:

To develop a comprehensive measure to characterize and compare disabilities among US Veterans and non-Veterans.

METHODS:

Using 2015-2018 pooled cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey data, we compared the frequency and survey-weighted prevalence of non-mutually exclusive sensory, social, and physical disabilities by Veteran status. We developed a measure for and examined the frequency and survey-weighted prevalence of eight mutually exclusive disability categories-sensory only; physical only; social only; sensory and physical; social and sensory; physical and social; and sensory, social, and physical.

RESULTS:

Among 118,818 NHIS respondents, 11,943 were Veterans. Veterans had a greater prevalence than non-Veterans of non-mutually exclusive physical [52.01% vs. 34.68% (p < 0.001)], sensory [44.47% vs. 21.79% (p < 0.001)], and social [17.20% vs. 11.61% (p < 0.001)] disabilities (after survey-weighting). The most frequently reported mutually exclusive disability categories for both Veterans and non-Veterans were sensory and physical (19.20% and 8.02%, p < 0.001) and physical only (16.24% and 15.69%, p = 0.216) (after survey-weighting). The least frequently reported mutually exclusive disability categories for both Veterans and non-Veterans were social only (0.31% and 0.44%, p = 0.136) and sensory and social (0.32% and 0.20%, respectively, 0.026) (after survey-weighting).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our disability metric demonstrates that Veterans have a higher disability prevalence than non-Veterans, and a higher prevalence than previously reported. Public policy and future research should consider this broader definition of disability to more fully account for the variable needs of people with disabilities.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Veteranos / Encuestas Epidemiológicas / Personas con Discapacidad / Evaluación de la Discapacidad Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Veteranos / Encuestas Epidemiológicas / Personas con Discapacidad / Evaluación de la Discapacidad Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos