Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Funding of evidence included within public comments submitted to inform Medicare national coverage determinations.
Lu, Angela; Ji, Robin Z; Magee, Marley P D; Ross, Joseph S; Ramachandran, Reshma; Redberg, Rita F; Dhruva, Sanket S.
Afiliación
  • Lu A; University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
  • Ji RZ; Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
  • Magee MPD; University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
  • Ross JS; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, United States.
  • Ramachandran R; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
  • Redberg RF; Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
  • Dhruva SS; Yale Collaboration for Regulatory Rigor, Integrity, and Transparency (CRRIT), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Health Aff Sch ; 2(6): qxae064, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919964
ABSTRACT
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on public comments submitted in response to proposed national coverage determinations to assist the agency in determining the coverage of items and services for Medicare beneficiaries. In a cross-sectional study, we characterized the cited evidence and what funding supported the cited evidence submitted in public comments to CMS for all therapeutic medical device national coverage determinations finalized between June 2019 and June 2022. Of 681 public comments, 159 (23%) cited at least 1 identifiable published scientific journal article. Within these 159 public comments, 198 unique articles were cited, 170 (86%) of which included funding statements or author disclosures. Among these, 96 (56%) disclosed funding from manufacturers that would benefit from Medicare coverage and/or were written by author(s) who received funding from these manufacturers. In summary, most public commenters for national coverage determinations did not cite published scientific journal articles to support their positions. Among those who did, more than half of articles were directly funded by manufacturers that would benefit from coverage. Greater funding of independent, non-industry-supported research may help provide unbiased evaluations of benefits and harms to support Medicare coverage decisions.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Health Aff Sch Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Health Aff Sch Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...