Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
General practitioner advance care planning knowledge and attitudes: ACP-GP cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Daenen, Frederick; Stevens, Julie; Deliens, Luc; Pype, Peter; Beernaert, Kim; De Vleminck, Aline; Pardon, Koen.
Afiliación
  • Daenen F; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium frederick.daenen@vub.be.
  • Stevens J; Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Deliens L; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Pype P; Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Beernaert K; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
  • De Vleminck A; Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
  • Pardon K; End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925875
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Advance care planning (ACP) supports adults understanding and sharing their values, goals, and preferences regarding future medical care. General practitioners (GPs) are key figures in conducting ACP conversations with patients. GPs' ACP knowledge and attitudes have been identified as potential barriers. This study evaluates the effects of ACP-GP, a complex ACP intervention, on GPs' knowledge and attitudes.

METHODS:

A phase-III cluster-randomised controlled trial. 35 Belgian GPs participated. The intervention included a training for GPs, ACP conversations, a patient workbook, and a documentation template. GPs' knowledge and attitudes were assessed using an adaptation of the Next Steps questionnaire, at baseline, three, and six months postintervention. Generalised estimating equations were applied to analyse the data.

RESULTS:

Analyses showed no intervention effect on GPs' knowledge (W(2)=4.18, p=.123) and attitudes (all W(2)<3.85, all p>.146) compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS:

The ACP-GP intervention did not improve GPs' knowledge and attitudes. Failure to detect an effect may stem from a ceiling effect, with GPs scoring high on baseline outcomes across groups. Questionnaires may require fine-tuning to accurately map their suggested role as potential barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Prospectively registered at ISRCTN (ISRCTN12995230) on 19 June 2020.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica
...