Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Identification of Gaps in Quality of Care and Good Practice Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights From a Literature Review and Qualitative Study of Nine Centers in North America.
Curtis, Jeffrey R; Bykerk, Vivian P; Crow, Mary K; Danila, Maria I; Haraoui, Boulos; Karpouzas, George A; Newman, Eric D; Norton, Hillary; Peterson, Jeff; Thorne, Carter; Wright, Grace C; Bain, Lorna.
Afiliación
  • Curtis JR; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Bykerk VP; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Crow MK; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Danila MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Haraoui B; Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  • Karpouzas GA; Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center, Torrance, California.
  • Newman ED; Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, ELAN Consulting Company, Danville, Pennsylvania.
  • Norton H; Santa Fe Rheumatology, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
  • Peterson J; Western Washington Medical Group, Everett, Washington.
  • Thorne C; Centre of Arthritis Excellence and The Arthritis Program Research Group, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wright GC; Grace C. Wright, MD, PC, New York, New York.
  • Bain L; Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada (current affiliation: Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
ACR Open Rheumatol ; 6(9): 542-552, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38937104
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Quality of care (QoC) delivery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to suffer from various challenges (eg, delay in diagnosis and referral) that can lead to poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify good practice interventions that address these challenges in RA care in North America.

METHODS:

The study was conducted in three

steps:

(1) literature review of existing publications and guidelines (April 2005 to April 2021) on QoC in RA; (2) in-person visits to >50 individual specialists and health care professionals across nine rheumatology centers in the United States and Canada to identify challenges in RA care and any corresponding good practice interventions; and (3) collation and organization of findings of the two previous methods by commonalities to identify key good practice interventions, followed by further review by RA experts to ensure key challenges and gaps in RA care were captured.

RESULTS:

Several challenges and eight good practice interventions were identified in RA care. The interventions were prioritized based on the perceived positive impact on the challenges in care and ease of implementation. High-priority interventions included the use of technology to improve care, streamlining specialist treatment, and facilitating comorbidity assessment and care. Other interventions included enabling patient access to optimal medication regimens and improving patient self-management strategies.

CONCLUSION:

Learnings from the study can be implemented in other rheumatology centers throughout North America to improve RA care. Although the study was completed before the COVID-19 pandemic, the findings remain relevant.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACR Open Rheumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACR Open Rheumatol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos