Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Towards objective and systematic evaluation of bias in artificial intelligence for medical imaging.
Stanley, Emma A M; Souza, Raissa; Winder, Anthony J; Gulve, Vedant; Amador, Kimberly; Wilms, Matthias; Forkert, Nils D.
Afiliación
  • Stanley EAM; Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Souza R; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
  • Winder AJ; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
  • Gulve V; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
  • Amador K; Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Wilms M; Department of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
  • Forkert ND; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942737
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Artificial intelligence (AI) models trained using medical images for clinical tasks often exhibit bias in the form of subgroup performance disparities. However, since not all sources of bias in real-world medical imaging data are easily identifiable, it is challenging to comprehensively assess their impacts. In this article, we introduce an analysis framework for systematically and objectively investigating the impact of biases in medical images on AI models. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Our framework utilizes synthetic neuroimages with known disease effects and sources of bias. We evaluated the impact of bias effects and the efficacy of 3 bias mitigation strategies in counterfactual data scenarios on a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier.

RESULTS:

The analysis revealed that training a CNN model on the datasets containing bias effects resulted in expected subgroup performance disparities. Moreover, reweighing was the most successful bias mitigation strategy for this setup. Finally, we demonstrated that explainable AI methods can aid in investigating the manifestation of bias in the model using this framework.

DISCUSSION:

The value of this framework is showcased in our findings on the impact of bias scenarios and efficacy of bias mitigation in a deep learning model pipeline. This systematic analysis can be easily expanded to conduct further controlled in silico trials in other investigations of bias in medical imaging AI.

CONCLUSION:

Our novel methodology for objectively studying bias in medical imaging AI can help support the development of clinical decision-support tools that are robust and responsible.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá