Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Investigation Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Hyaluronate-Based Ophthalmical Viscosurgical Devices FIDIAL PLUS and IAL®-F in Cataract Surgery.
Pagnacco, Camilla; Tosi, Roberto; Dalsaso, Jessica; Fraccaroli, Sebastiano; Saggin, Filippo; Marchini, Giorgio.
Afiliación
  • Pagnacco C; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Tosi R; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Dalsaso J; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Fraccaroli S; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Saggin F; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Marchini G; Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Paediatrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Verona, Italy.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38949891
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To protect the corneal endothelium, various ophthalmical viscoelastic devices (OVDs) are used during cataract surgery. In this study, we compared two sodium hyaluronate-based OVD, the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS OVD (test) with the animal-derived IAL®-F OVD (reference) during the surgical procedure.

Methods:

Fifty patients with bilateral cataract participated in the study 50 eyes randomly received FIDIAL PLUS and 50 eyes received IAL®-F (ratio 11). Noninferior efficacy of FIDIAL PLUS compared with reference OVD (first objective) was evaluated using a paired t-test comparing the mean percent loss of corneal endothelial cells (CECs) with FIDIAL PLUS against the mean percent loss with IAL®-F. Corneal endothelial protection during cataract surgery with FIDIAL PLUS without significant (≥30 mmHg) postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) increase (main secondary objective) was assessed using a repeated measures logistic model comparing the incidence of significant postoperative IOP elevation between the two groups. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy were also evaluated by assessing secondary endpoints before and after surgery.

Results:

FIDIAL PLUS showed a statistically noninferior efficacy compared with IAL®-F; there was no significant increase in IOP in either group or different trends of the secondary endpoints were observed between the OVD groups. The safety profile was similar in both OVD groups and no adverse device effects were reported.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates the equivalent efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the bacteria-derived FIDIAL PLUS compared with the animal-derived IAL®-F, confirming the clinical value of this product.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia