Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of colonoscopy skill using machine learning to measure quality: Proof-of-concept and initial validation.
Wittbrodt, Matthew; Klug, Matthew; Etemadi, Mozziyar; Yang, Anthony; Pandolfino, John E; Keswani, Rajesh N.
Afiliación
  • Wittbrodt M; Information Services, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, United States.
  • Klug M; Information Services, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, United States.
  • Etemadi M; Information Services, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, United States.
  • Yang A; Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States.
  • Pandolfino JE; Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States.
  • Keswani RN; Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States.
Endosc Int Open ; 12(7): E849-E853, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38966321
ABSTRACT
Background and study aims Low-quality colonoscopy increases cancer risk but measuring quality remains challenging. We developed an automated, interactive assessment of colonoscopy quality (AI-CQ) using machine learning (ML). Methods Based on quality guidelines, metrics selected for AI development included insertion time (IT), withdrawal time (WT), polyp detection rate (PDR), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC). Two novel metrics were also developed HQ-WT (time during withdrawal with clear image) and WT-PT (withdrawal time subtracting polypectomy time). The model was pre-trained using a self-supervised vision transformer on unlabeled colonoscopy images and then finetuned for multi-label classification on another mutually exclusive colonoscopy image dataset. A timeline of video predictions and metric calculations were presented to clinicians in addition to the raw video using a web-based application. The model was externally validated using 50 colonoscopies at a second hospital. Results The AI-CQ accuracy to identify cecal intubation was 88%. IT ( P = 0.99) and WT ( P = 0.99) were highly correlated between manual and AI-CQ measurements with a median difference of 1.5 seconds and 4.5 seconds, respectively. AI-CQ PDR did not significantly differ from manual PDR (47.6% versus 45.5%, P = 0.66). Retroflexion was correctly identified in 95.2% and number of right colon evaluations in 100% of colonoscopies. HQ-WT was 45.9% of, and significantly correlated with ( P = 0.85) WT time. Conclusions An interactive AI assessment of colonoscopy skill can automatically assess quality. We propose that this tool can be utilized to rapidly identify and train providers in need of remediation.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Int Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Int Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...