Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Phase 3 Study Assessing Lot-to-lot Consistency of RSVPreF3 Vaccine and its Immune Response, Safety, and Reactogenicity When Co-administered with FLU-D-QIV.
Chime, Nnenna; Anspach, Bruno; Jain, Vishal; Laajalahti, Outi; Ollinger, Thierry; Yaplee, Deborah; Kim, Joon Hyung.
Afiliación
  • Chime N; GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Anspach B; GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Jain V; GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Laajalahti O; FVR Seinäjoki, Seinäjoki, Finland.
  • Ollinger T; GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
  • Yaplee D; GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Kim JH; GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
J Infect Dis ; 2024 Jul 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970327
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A single-dose investigational respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, RSV prefusion protein F3 (RSVPreF3), was co-administered with a single-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine (FLU-D-QIV) in a phase 3, randomized, controlled, multicenter study in healthy, non-pregnant women aged 18-49 years.

METHODS:

The study was observer-blind to evaluate the lot-to-lot consistency of RSVPreF3, and single-blind to evaluate the immune response, safety, and reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 co-administered with FLU-D-QIV.

RESULTS:

A total of 1415 participants were included in the per-protocol set. There was a robust immune response at day 31 across each of the 3 RSVPreF3 vaccine lots; adjusted geometric mean concentration ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were 1.01 (0.91, 1.12), 0.93 (0.84, 1.03), and 0.92 (0.83, 1.02) for RSV1/RSV2, RSV1/RSV3, and RSV2/RSV3, respectively. For FLU-D-QIV co-administered with RSVPreF3, versus FLU-D-QIV alone at day 31, noninferiority was satisfied for 3 of 4 strains assessed, with the lower limit of the 95% CI for geometric mean ratio >0.67.

CONCLUSIONS:

Immunogenic consistency was demonstrated for 3 separate lots of RSVPreF3. Immunogenic noninferiority was demonstrated when comparing FLU-D-QIV administered alone, versus co-administered with RSVPreF3, for 3 strains of FLU-D-QIV. Co-administration was well tolerated, and both vaccines had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profiles. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT05045144; EudraCT, 2021-000357-26.
This was a phase 3 study that compared antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus (or RSV for short) between women who were given 3 different production batches of RSV prefusion protein F3 (known as RSVPreF3) vaccine. The study also compared the antibodies between women who received either an RSV vaccine together with a flu vaccine (known as FLU-D-QIV), or a flu vaccine alone. The flu vaccine contained 4 different strains of flu virus. The study involved 1415 healthy, non-pregnant women aged 18­49 years. The antibodies checked after 31 days showed strong immune responses for all 3 RSV vaccine production batches, and similar immune responses between each of the 3 RSV vaccine production batches. The immune response of 3 of the 4 flu strains was not less when the flu vaccine was given together with the RSV vaccine than the immune response when flu vaccine was given alone and both vaccines were well tolerated.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Infect Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos