Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of Lithium-Ion Battery Performance Utilizing Magnetic Controllable Superionic Conductor Li3(V1-x Fe x )2(PO4)3/C (x = 0.05 and 0.10).
Lee, Yu-Ting; Chen, Yi-Tsen; Cheng, Jun-Yi; Yang, Chun-Chuen; Lin, Kuen-Song.
Afiliación
  • Lee YT; Department of Physics, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Zhongbei Rd., Zhongli, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan.
  • Chen YT; Department of Physics, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Zhongbei Rd., Zhongli, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan.
  • Cheng JY; Department of Photonics, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., Tainan 701401, Taiwan.
  • Yang CC; Department of Physics, National Central University, No. 300, Zhongda Rd., Zhongli, Taoyuan 320317, Taiwan.
  • Lin KS; Department of Physics, National Central University, No. 300, Zhongda Rd., Zhongli, Taoyuan 320317, Taiwan.
ACS Omega ; 9(26): 28283-28292, 2024 Jul 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973933
ABSTRACT
Lithium-ion batteries with Li3V2(PO4)3/C as the cathode have been a popular research topic in recent years; however, studies of the effects of external magnetic fields on them are less common. This study investigates the effects of an external magnetic field applied parallel to the direction of the anode and cathode on the ion transport through iron-doped Li3(V1-x Fe x )2(PO4)3, the outer carbon coating, the film/electrolyte/separator, and up to the lithium metal electrode on a microscopic level. The results reveal that for the x = 0.05 sample with lower doping, the magnetostriction expansion of Li3(V1-x Fe x )2(PO4)3 and the magnetostrictive contraction effect of the outer ordered carbon layer cancel each other out, resulting in no significant enhancement of the battery's energy and power density due to the external magnetic field. In contrast, the x = 0.1 sample, lacking magnetostrictive contraction in the outer ordered carbon layer, shows that its energy and power density can be influenced by the magnetic field. Under zero magnetic field, the cyclic performance exhibits superior average capacity performance in the x = 0.05 sample, while the x = 0.1 sample shows a lower decay rate. Both samples are affected by the magnetic field; however, the x = 0.1 sample performs better under magnetic conditions. In particular, in the C-rate tests under a magnetic field, the sample with x = 0.1 showed a significant relative reduction in capacity decay rate by 20.18% compared to the sample with x = 0.05.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACS Omega Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ACS Omega Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán
...