Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.
Elsman, Ellen B M; Mokkink, Lidwine B; Terwee, Caroline B; Beaton, Dorcas; Gagnier, Joel J; Tricco, Andrea C; Baba, Ami; Butcher, Nancy J; Smith, Maureen; Hofstetter, Catherine; Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee; Berardi, Anna; Farmer, Julie; Haywood, Kirstie L; Krause, Karolin R; Markham, Sarah; Mayo-Wilson, Evan; Mehdipour, Ava; Ricketts, Juanna; Szatmari, Peter; Touma, Zahi; Moher, David; Offringa, Martin.
Afiliación
  • Elsman EBM; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Mokkink LB; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Terwee CB; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Beaton D; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Gagnier JJ; Institute of Work and Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Tricco AC; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Baba A; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Butcher NJ; Epidemiology Division and Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Smith M; Queen's Collaboration for Health Care Quality Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
  • Hofstetter C; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Aiyegbusi OL; Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Berardi A; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Farmer J; Cochrane Consumer Network, London, UK.
  • Haywood KL; OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Krause KR; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Markham S; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Mayo-Wilson E; IRCCS NEUROMED, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.
  • Mehdipour A; Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ricketts J; Warwick Research in Nursing, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, UK.
  • Szatmari P; Cundill Centre for Child and Youth Depression, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Touma Z; Department of Biostatistics & Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, UK.
  • Moher D; Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, 2101C McGavran-Greenberg Hall Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
  • Offringa M; School of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Qual Life Res ; 33(8): 2029-2046, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980635
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Although comprehensive and widespread guidelines on how to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) exist, for example from the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) initiative, key information is often missing in published reports. This article describes the development of an extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

METHODS:

The development process followed the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines and included a literature search, expert consultations, a Delphi study, a hybrid workgroup meeting, pilot testing, and an end-of-project meeting, with integrated patient/public involvement.

RESULTS:

From the literature and expert consultation, 49 potentially relevant reporting items were identified. Round 1 of the Delphi study was completed by 103 panelists, whereas round 2 and 3 were completed by 78 panelists. After 3 rounds, agreement (≥ 67%) on inclusion and wording was reached for 44 items. Eleven items without consensus for inclusion and/or wording were discussed at a workgroup meeting attended by 24 participants. Agreement was reached for the inclusion and wording of 10 items, and the deletion of 1 item. Pilot testing with 65 authors of OMI systematic reviews further improved the guideline through minor changes in wording and structure, finalized during the end-of-project meeting. The final checklist to facilitate the reporting of full systematic review reports contains 54 (sub)items addressing the review's title, abstract, plain language summary, open science, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Thirteen items pertaining to the title and abstract are also included in a separate abstract checklist, guiding authors in reporting for example conference abstracts.

CONCLUSION:

PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific application. NOTE In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the web sites of the journals Health and Quality of Life Outcomes; Journal of Clinical Epidemiology; Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes; Quality of Life Research.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Técnica Delphi / Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Qual Life Res Asunto de la revista: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá