Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Travoprost Intracameral Implant Demonstrates Superior IOP Lowering Versus Topical Prostaglandin Analog Monotherapy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.
Bacharach, Jason; Doan, Long V; Stephens, Kerry G; Usner, Dale W; Kothe, Angela C; Katz, L Jay; Navratil, Tomas.
Afiliación
  • Bacharach J; North Bay Eye Associates, Inc., 104 Lynch Creek Way, Suite 15, Petaluma, CA, 94954, USA.
  • Doan LV; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA.
  • Stephens KG; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA.
  • Usner DW; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA.
  • Kothe AC; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA.
  • Katz LJ; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA.
  • Navratil T; Glaukos Corporation, One Glaukos Way, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, USA. tnavratil@glaukos.com.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 13(9): 2357-2367, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985408
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study was conducted to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) treatment effect of the slow-eluting (SE) travoprost intracameral implant to the IOP treatment effect of topical prostaglandin analog (PGA) monotherapy in a subgroup of subjects who were on pre-study PGA monotherapy prior to enrollment in the two pivotal phase 3 trials of the travoprost intracameral implant.

METHODS:

A combined study population of 133 subjects from two phase 3 trials, who were on topical PGA monotherapy at screening, subsequently underwent a washout period from their topical PGA, and then were randomized and administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant. The subjects were analyzed for the IOP treatment effects of the pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the in-study SE travoprost intracameral implant. Paired t-tests were used to compare the difference in screening minus post-washout baseline IOP versus month 3 minus post-washout baseline IOP. The IOP-lowering efficacy in eyes administered an SE travoprost intracameral implant was compared to the IOP lowering in the same eyes while on a topical PGA monotherapy prior to study entry.

RESULTS:

Pre-study topical PGA monotherapy and the SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated IOP treatment effects of -5.76 mmHg and -7.07 mmHg, respectively. The IOP-lowering treatment effect was significantly greater by 1.31 mmHg for the SE travoprost intracameral implant relative to pre-study PGA monotherapy (95% confidence interval -2.01, -0.60; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS:

The SE travoprost intracameral implant demonstrated superior IOP-lowering treatment effect versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy with a superiority margin that was both statistically significant and clinically meaningful. The greater IOP reduction from baseline while on the SE implant versus pre-study topical PGA monotherapy may be a reflection of the optimized adherence and continuous elution of PGA therapy into the anterior chamber achieved with the SE travoprost intracameral implant. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03519386 and NCT03868124.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmol Ther Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido