Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine Learning Prediction of Treatment Response to Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Salehi, Fatemeh; Lopera Gonzalez, Luis I; Bayat, Sara; Kleyer, Arnd; Zanca, Dario; Brost, Alexander; Schett, Georg; Eskofier, Bjoern M.
Afiliación
  • Salehi F; Machine Learning and Data Analytics Laboratory, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Lopera Gonzalez LI; Instutue of Digital Health, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Bayat S; Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Kleyer A; Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Zanca D; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  • Brost A; Machine Learning and Data Analytics Laboratory, Department Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.
  • Schett G; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301 Forchheim, Germany.
  • Eskofier BM; Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 13(13)2024 Jul 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38999454
ABSTRACT

Background:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown efficacy in treating Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Predicting treatment outcomes for RA is crucial as approximately 30% of patients do not respond to bDMARDs and only half achieve a sustained response. This study aims to leverage machine learning to predict both initial response at 6 months and sustained response at 12 months using baseline clinical data.

Methods:

Baseline clinical data were collected from 154 RA patients treated at the University Hospital in Erlangen, Germany. Five machine learning models were compared Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest. Nested cross-validation was employed to ensure robustness and avoid overfitting, integrating hyperparameter tuning within its process.

Results:

XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy for predicting initial response (AUC-ROC of 0.91), while AdaBoost was the most effective for sustained response (AUC-ROC of 0.84). Key predictors included the Disease Activity Score-28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), with higher scores at baseline associated with lower response chances at 6 and 12 months. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) identified the most important baseline features and visualized their directional effects on treatment response and sustained response.

Conclusions:

These findings can enhance RA treatment plans and support clinical decision-making, ultimately improving patient outcomes by predicting response before starting medication.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...