Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robotic Excision of Intravesical Mesh Following Transvaginal Mesh-Based Prolapse Repair.
Sarriera Valentin, Gabriela F; Jefferson, Francis A; Anderson, Katherine T; Linder, Brian J.
Afiliación
  • Sarriera Valentin GF; Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
  • Jefferson FA; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Anderson KT; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
  • Linder BJ; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Linder.Brian@mayo.edu.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(8): 1719-1721, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39002047
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

We describe the surgical management of intravesical mesh perforation following transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS:

A 73-year-old woman presented with intravesical mesh perforation 17 years following transvaginal mesh-based prolapse repair at an outside hospital. The patient presented with intermittent hematuria and recurrent urinary tract infections. Cystoscopy demonstrated an approximately 3-cm area of intravesical mesh with associated stone spanning from the bladder neck through the left trigone and ureteral orifice. A robotic-assisted transvesical mesh excision and left ureteroneocystostomy was carried out. Robotic-assisted repair was performed transvesically via transverse bladder dome cystotomy. Dissection was carried out circumferentially around the mesh in the vesicovaginal plane, including a 1-cm margin of healthy tissue. The eroded mesh was excised, and the vaginal wall and bladder were closed with running absorbable sutures. Given the location of the mesh excision and repair, a left ureteral reimplantation was performed. The transverse cystotomy was closed and retrograde bladder filling with methylene blue-stained saline confirmed watertight repairs, with no vaginal extravasation.

RESULTS:

The patient was discharged the following morning and had an uneventful recovery, including transurethral indwelling catheter removal at 2 weeks after CT cystogram and subsequent ureteral stent removal at 6 weeks postoperatively. At 2-month follow-up she had no new urinary symptoms or obstruction of the ureteral reimplantation on renal ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS:

A robotic-assisted approach is a feasible option for managing transvaginal prolapse mesh perforation into the bladder. Pelvic surgeons must be well equipped to handle transvaginal mesh complications in a patient-specific manner.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mallas Quirúrgicas / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int Urogynecol J Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido