Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A combined nutritional risk index and carcinoembryonic antigen score predicts the outcome in radically resected colorectal cancer.
Chen, Guanzhou; Xie, Jiang; Li, Panhua; Wang, Qin; Ye, Qianwen; Feng, Shouhan.
Afiliación
  • Chen G; Department of Emergency Medicine, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
  • Xie J; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
  • Li P; Department of Oncology, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
  • Wang Q; Department of Nursing, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
  • Ye Q; Department of Oncology, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital, Sanya, People's Republic of China.
  • Feng S; Department of Oncology, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Huzhou, People's Republic of China.
ANZ J Surg ; 2024 Jul 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39016342
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nutritional risk index (NRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) are useful prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, the prognostic value of a combination of the NRI and CEA, namely, the NRI and CEA score (NCS), needs further investigation.

METHODS:

Stage I-III CRC patients were collected and then divided into three subgroups by counting the NCS NCS 1 high NRI with normal CEA; NCS 2 high NRI with elevated CEA or low NRI with normal CEA; and NCS 3 low NRI with elevated CEA. The differences in outcome, counted as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), were tested among the subgroups.

RESULTS:

A total of 285 patients were enrolled, with 108 in NCS 1, 118 in NCS 2 and 59 in NCS 3. Patient features, including age, tumour deposit, T stage, N stage and TNM stage, were significantly different in the NCS subgroups. Both the DFS (log-rank = 26.06, P<0.001) and OS (log-rank = 39.10, P<0.001) were significant in different NCS subgroups, even in maximum tumour diameter ≤4 cm cases (DFS log-rank = 21.42, P<0.001; OS log-rank = 30.95, P<0.001), and NCS 1 patients displayed the best outcome compared with the rest of the subgroups. NCS was also found to be an independent risk factor for both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS:

NCS was a useful prognostic indicator in stages I-III CRC patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ANZ J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ANZ J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Australia