Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of postoperative esophagram following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
Benson, Jamie; Boutros, Christina; Khan, Saher-Zahra; Lyons, Joshua; Hashimoto, Daniel A; Marks, Jeffrey M.
Afiliación
  • Benson J; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. Jamie.Benson@UHHospitals.org.
  • Boutros C; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Jamie.Benson@UHHospitals.org.
  • Khan SZ; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Lyons J; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Hashimoto DA; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Marks JM; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Surg Endosc ; 38(9): 5148-5152, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39039293
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata.

RESULTS:

There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group.

CONCLUSION:

There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acalasia del Esófago / Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales / Miotomía Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acalasia del Esófago / Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales / Miotomía Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Alemania