Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Developing a questionnaire for assessing clinician- and patient-reported outcomes in actinic keratosis: Results from an expert panel.
Berman, Brian; Armstrong, April; Lebwohl, Mark; Grada, Ayman; Bhatia, Neal; Patel, Vishal A; Rigel, Darrell; Del Rosso, James; Schlesinger, Todd; Kircik, Leon; Salem, Raidah; Narayanan, Siva; Kasujee, Ismail.
Afiliación
  • Berman B; University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
  • Armstrong A; Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  • Lebwohl M; Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Grada A; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Health Education Campus, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Bhatia N; Therapeutics Clinical Research, San Diego, California.
  • Patel VA; George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Rigel D; Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Del Rosso J; Touro University Nevada, Henderson, Nevada.
  • Schlesinger T; Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas, Charleston, South Carolina.
  • Kircik L; Mount Sinai Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Salem R; Medical Affairs, Almirall, LLC, Malvern, Pennsylvania.
  • Narayanan S; Avant Health LLC, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Kasujee I; Global Medical Affairs, Almirall SA, Barcelona, Spain.
JAAD Int ; 16: 192-198, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040844
ABSTRACT

Background:

Current assessments on topical treatment attributes in actinic keratosis (AK) do not evaluate safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction from both clinician and patient perspectives, creating an unmet need for more comprehensive AK-specific measures that fully capture the patient experience.

Objective:

To develop an actinic keratosis-specific expert panel questionnaire (AK-EPQ) of patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes for use in research studies.

Methods:

Using interviews of patients with AK and targeted literature reviews, a 9-person consensus panel of dermatologists with expertise in AK treatment was convened to develop the AK-EPQ to assess AK-specific patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes.

Results:

Nine expert advisers achieved consensus on 11 AK-EPQ items that encompass patient and clinician perspectives of treatment-related local skin reactions, clinical and cosmetic outcomes associated with AK, and satisfaction with treatment; the AK-EPQ will be first implemented in the Patient-Reported Outcomes for Actinic Keratosis study (NCT05260073).

Limitations:

The AK-EPQ does not directly measure quality of life, although it can be used with validated quality of life instruments.

Conclusion:

The newly developed AK-EPQ elicits insights into the patient and clinician experience with AK treatments. Comparative probing of these perspectives may help optimize precision medicine in AK treatment.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JAAD Int Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JAAD Int Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article