Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combination of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Compared With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Alone in the Treatment of Dermal Type of Melasma: A Single-Blinded Randomized Split-Face Study.
Amiri, Rezvan; Karimi Maskooni, Mahbooba; Farsinejad, Alireza; Karvar, Mehran; Khalili, Maryam; Aflatoonian, Mahin.
Afiliación
  • Amiri R; Department of Dermatology, Leishmaniasis Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Karimi Maskooni M; Department of Dermatology, Leishmaniasis Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Farsinejad A; Department of Hematology and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Karvar M; Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Khalili M; Department of Dermatology Clinical Research Development Unit, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
  • Aflatoonian M; Department of Dermatology Clinical Research Development Unit, Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Indian Dermatol Online J ; 15(4): 593-598, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050052
ABSTRACT

Background:

Response to the current available treatments of melasma, dermal type, in particular, is usually gradual and can result in possible side effects. Aim and

Objectives:

In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and topical 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in comparison with monotherapy using topical 4% HQ alone in the treatment of dermal type of melasma. Materials and

Methods:

This is a single-blinded, randomized, split-face clinical trial on twenty female patients with dermal type of melasma. Patients were asked to apply topical 4% HQ on both sides of their face at night for 6 months. In each participant, one side of the face was randomly chosen to receive monthly intradermal injections of PRGF for 3 sessions. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed using hemi melasma area and severity index (MASI) score, physician's global assessment (PGA), and patients' global assessment (PtGA).

Results:

Both groups revealed significant improvement in hemi-MASI score during the treatment course. Mean percentage of improvement at the end of study was 40.38 ± 6.04% and 33.42 ± 3.23% in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PGA demonstrated excellent-to-marked improvement in melasma in 25% and 5% of patients in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PtGA showed high levels of satisfaction in 15% of patients in the combination therapy group (vs. 0% in the monotherapy group) (P = 0.05).

Conclusion:

Differences between the two treatment groups in terms of hemi-MASI and PGA scores were not statistically significant; however, patients demonstrated higher satisfaction with combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ compared with topical HQ alone. Thereby, combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ can be suggested as a safe alternative therapeutic approach and may hold promise in the development of future therapeutic options for dermal type of melasma.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Indian Dermatol Online J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Indian Dermatol Online J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán