Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of replacing conventional alfalfa hay with lower-lignin alfalfa hay on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, and energy utilization in lactating Jersey cows.
Buse, K K; Carroll, A L; Bradford, B J; Min, D; Jagadish, K; Kononoff, P J.
Afiliación
  • Buse KK; Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503.
  • Carroll AL; Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503.
  • Bradford BJ; Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.
  • Min D; Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
  • Jagadish K; Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79410.
  • Kononoff PJ; Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68503. Electronic address: pkononoff2@unl.edu.
J Dairy Sci ; 2024 Jul 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39067760
ABSTRACT
Lower-lignin (LoL) varieties of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) have been developed in recent years, and have the potential to positively impact animal performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing the proportion of LoL alfalfa hay in diets fed to lactating dairy cows. Research plots were planted with a conventional variety (CON; Dairyland Hybriforce 3400), and 2 LoL varieties (LLG; 54HVX42 and LLB; Aflorex HiGest 460). After harvest, the LoL varieties were blended in equal proportions for feeding. Twelve multiparous Jersey cows (100 ± 4 d in milk) were used in a 3 × 3 Latin square with 3 periods of 28 d. Cows were assigned to 3 diets containing 0 (CNTRL), 16.1 (MdLL), and 32.2% (HiLL) of the diet DM as LoL alfalfa hay, which replaced CON. The CON alfalfa had average CP, NDF, and lignin contents (DM basis) of 20.5 ± 1.15, 42.1 ± 1.37, and 6.81 ± 0.57%, respectively, while the LoL alfalfa averaged 19.8 ± 0.75, 39.9 ± 1.56, and 6.07 ± 0.28%, respectively. No difference was observed in DMI (20.4 ± 0.61 kg/d). No difference in milk yield was observed, averaging 31.0 ± 1.02 kg/d across treatments. Similarly, no difference was observed in ECM yield (averaging 36.2 ± 1.43 kg/d). Feed conversion (ECM/DMI) tended to increase linearly with LoL alfalfa inclusion (1.74 to 1.80 ± 0.03). No difference was observed for milk fat yield and content (1.39 ± 0.075 kg/d and 4.51 ± 0.219%) or milk protein yield and content (1.06 ± 0.041 kg/d and 3.43 ± 0.096%). Total methane production quadratically decreased from CNTRL to MdLL then increased to HiLL (441, 389, 412 ± 18.2 L/d, respectively). No differences were observed on total-tract digestibility of DM (averaging 67.2 ± 0.55%) and NDF (averaging 50.9 ± 1.56%). No difference was observed in the concentration of DE, ME or NEL was observed averaging 2.82 ± 0.021, 2.51 ± 0.027, and 1.72 ± 0.030 Mcal/kg respectively. Our results suggest that replacing CON alfalfa with LoL alfalfa has no effects on milk production, milk composition, or nutrient digestibility but may improve feed efficiency.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos