Stress induced on permanent mandible first molar and space maintainer under normal masticatory forces: a finite element study.

ABSTRACT

Background: The band and loop space maintainer is used to maintain the missing space of deciduous molars which are lost early. When the second deciduous molar is lost prematurely, the stress on the first permanent molar during different degrees of development may vary when it is the abutment. The design and use of the space maintainer may also lead to damage of the loop. The purpose of this article is to use the finite element method to study the stress on the first permanent molar and the loop with or without occlusal contact, with the first permanent molar of four different degrees of development serving as the abutment. We aimed to guide the clinical design and use of the space maintainer. Methods: We developed finite element models of the mandibular first permanent molar and the band and loop space maintainer, and simulated alveolar bone, periodontal ligament (PDL), enamel and dentin. The four developmental stages were 1/2 (I), 2/3 (II), 3/4 (III) and full development (IV). Ansys Workbench was used to analyze the effects of root development and occlusal contact between the loop and the opposite jaw on abutment teeth and the loop. Abutment teeth were statically loaded vertically and obliquely with a force of 70 N. The loop was statically loaded vertically with a force of 14 N. The stress on all structures and the displacement trends of the loop were calculated. Results: The stress on enamel, dentin, PDL and alveolar bone were similar, and the concentration was consistent. But if there was occlusal contact, the loop produced maximum displacement at the near middle edge of contact with the anterior teeth. When the loop was in occlusal contact with the opposing occlusal tooth, the peak value of the equivalent stress on the space maintainer under vertical load was group I > group IV > group III > group II, and the maximum principal stress peak change was group I > group III > group II > group IV. The change of the equivalent stress peak value of the loop under oblique load was group I > group III > group IV > group II, and the maximum principal stress peak change was group III > group I > group II > group IV. When the loop was not in occlusal contact with the opposing occlusal tooth, the peak value of the equivalent stress on the space maintainer under vertical load was group IV > group I > group II > group III, and the maximum principal stress peak change was group IV > group I > group II > group III. The change of the equivalent stress peak value of the space maintainer under oblique load was group I > group IV > group II > group III, and the maximum principal stress peak change was group I > group IV > group II > group III. Conclusions: Our results suggested that whenever possible, choosing the teeth with nearly complete root development as the abutment of the space maintainer is advisable. The design and use of the band and loop space maintainer should avoid occlusal contact with the occlusal teeth to prevent deformation of the loop.