Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemical Immobilization Effects on Cougar (Felis concolor) Movement.
Littlefair, Carter J; Derocher, Andrew E; Frame, Paul F; Edwards, Mark A; Frame, Delaney D; Slater, Owen M; Smereka, Corey A.
Afiliación
  • Littlefair CJ; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, CW405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
  • Derocher AE; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, CW405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
  • Frame PF; Fish and Wildlife Stewardship, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, 9920 108 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2M4, Canada.
  • Edwards MA; Office of the Chief Scientist, Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, 9888 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0G2, Canada.
  • Frame DD; Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 751 General Services Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
  • Slater OM; Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, 250 Diamond Avenue, Spruce Grove, Alberta T7X 4C7, Canada.
  • Smereka CA; Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada.
J Wildl Dis ; 2024 Aug 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093818
ABSTRACT
Capturing and handling wildlife is a common practice for both management and research. As telemetry use has become common, the need to capture and chemically immobilize wildlife has increased. Understanding how long the effects of immobilizing agents last after releasing the animal is often poorly understood but needed to ensure that analyses use data that reflect natural behavior. Between 2016 and 2021, 87 cougars (Puma concolor) were chemically immobilized with medetomidine, zolazepam, and tiletamine (MZT) and collared across west-central Alberta, Canada, 27 of which were individuals being recollared. We examined the distance an individual traveled per day and compared equivalent periods before and after the recollaring event to determine whether postcapture movement rates were significantly different from precapture rates. Within 1 d of the recollaring, daily movement rates had returned to precapture rates (t20=2.09, P=0.18). Our results provide insight on how MZT used in cougars affects their postcapture movement and thus may be helpful in interpreting movement data after release.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Wildl Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Wildl Dis Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá