Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
IFEM model curriculum: emergency medicine learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education.
Cevik, Arif Alper; Cakal, Elif Dilek; Kwan, James; Chu, Simon; Mtombeni, Sithembile; Anantharaman, Venkataraman; Jouriles, Nicholas; Peng, David Teng Kuan; Singer, Andrew; Cameron, Peter; Ducharme, James; Wai, Abraham; Manthey, David Edwin; Hobgood, Cherri; Mulligan, Terrence; Menendez, Edgardo; Jakubaszko, Juliusz.
Afiliación
  • Cevik AA; Emergency Medicine Section, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. aacevik@uaeu.ac.ae.
  • Cakal ED; Department of Emergency Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, UAE. aacevik@uaeu.ac.ae.
  • Kwan J; Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
  • Chu S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Mtombeni S; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Anantharaman V; University of Adelaide, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, SA, Australia.
  • Jouriles N; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Namibia, Northern Campus, Oshakati, Namibia.
  • Peng DTK; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Singer A; Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.
  • Cameron P; Department of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Ducharme J; Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  • Wai A; Australian National University Medical School, Acton, ACT, Australia.
  • Manthey DE; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
  • Hobgood C; The Alfred Hospital, Emergency and Trauma Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Mulligan T; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Menendez E; Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Jakubaszko J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Int J Emerg Med ; 17(1): 98, 2024 Aug 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39103797
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) published its model curriculum for medical student education in emergency medicine in 2009. Because of the evolving principles of emergency medicine and medical education, driven by societal, professional, and educational developments, there was a need for an update on IFEM recommendations. The main objective of the update process was creating Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and providing tier-based recommendations.

METHOD:

A consensus methodology combining nominal group and modified Delphi methods was used. The nominal group had 15 members representing eight countries in six regions. The process began with a review of the 2009 curriculum by IFEM Core Curriculum and Education Committee (CCEC) members, followed by a three-phase update process involving survey creation [The final survey document included 55 items in 4 sections, namely, participant & context information (16 items), intended learning outcomes (6 items), principles unique to emergency medicine (20 items), and content unique to emergency medicine (13 items)], participant selection from IFEM member countries and survey implementation, and data analysis to create the recommendations.

RESULTS:

Out of 112 invitees (CCEC members and IFEM member country nominees), 57 (50.9%) participants from 27 countries participated. Eighteen (31.6%) participants were from LMICs, while 39 (68.4%) were from HICs. Forty-four (77.2%) participants have been involved with medical students' emergency medicine training for more than five years in their careers, and 56 (98.2%) have been involved with medical students' training in the last five years. Thirty-five (61.4%) participants have completed a form of training in medical education. The exercise resulted in the formulation of tiered ILO recommendations. Tier 1 ILOs are recommended for all medical schools, Tier 2 ILOs are recommended for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources, and Tier 3 ILOs should be considered for medical schools based on perceived local healthcare system needs and/or adequate resources.

CONCLUSION:

The updated IFEM ILO recommendations are designed to be applicable across diverse educational and healthcare settings. These recommendations aim to provide a clear framework for medical schools to prepare graduates with essential emergency care capabilities immediately after completing medical school. The successful distribution and implementation of these recommendations hinge on support from faculty and administrators, ensuring that future healthcare professionals are well-prepared for emergency medical care.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Emerg Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Emiratos Árabes Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Emerg Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Emiratos Árabes Unidos