Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantification of the Environmental Impact of Feeding Yeast Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae Actisaf Sc 47 in Dairy Cow: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach.
Salah, Nizar; Legendre, Héloïse; Paiva, Erika; Duclos, Julie; Briche, Maxime; Maaoui, Mariem; Scholten, Jasper; Garat Boute, Céline.
Afiliación
  • Salah N; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
  • Legendre H; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
  • Paiva E; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
  • Duclos J; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
  • Briche M; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
  • Maaoui M; Blonk Sustainability Tools, Groen van Prinsterersingel 45, 2805 TD Gouda, The Netherlands.
  • Scholten J; Blonk Sustainability Tools, Groen van Prinsterersingel 45, 2805 TD Gouda, The Netherlands.
  • Garat Boute C; Phileo by Lesaffre, 59520 Marquette-lez-Lille, France.
Animals (Basel) ; 14(15)2024 Jul 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39123728
ABSTRACT
Today, one of the major challenges of dairy farmers is to reduce their environmental footprint to establish more effective, efficient, and sustainable production systems. Feed additives such as yeast probiotics could potentially allow them to achieve these objectives through the improvement of milk production, feed efficiency, and ration valorization, hence mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) principle was performed to estimate the environmental impact of the production and supplementation of a commercial yeast probiotic (Actisaf Sc 47) in three trials performed in three different countries that are representative for around 50% of the milk production in Europe France (French trial), United Kingdom (UK trial), and Germany (German trial). For each trial, two groups of animals were compared control, without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation, used as baseline; and experimental, with Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation at 5 or 10 g/cow/day. Different impact categories were analyzed for each group to calculate the impact of producing 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk. An initial analysis was done only during the period of Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation and showed than the supplementation with Actisaf Sc 47 reduced, on average by 5%, the carbon footprint during the three trials. A second analysis was done via the extrapolation of all the data of each trial to an annual farm level, including the lactation period (305 days), dry period (60 days), and the period with and without Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation. Reported at a farm annual scale, the average reduction allowed by Actisaf Sc 47 supplementation was 2.9, 2.05, 2.47, 1.67, 2.28, 2.18, 2.14, and 2.28% of the carbon footprint, land use, water use, resource use, acidification, freshwater eutrophication, marine eutrophication, and terrestrial eutrophication, respectively. On average, the production of 1 kg of fat- and protein-corrected milk by using Actisaf Sc 47 was shown to improve environmental impacts compared to control. Regarding Actisaf Sc 47 production, the LCA showed that the production of 1 kg of Actisaf Sc 47 emitted 2.1 kg CO2 eq with a negligible contribution to total the carbon footprint of milk ranging from 0.005 to 0.016%. The use of Actisaf Sc 47 in dairy cows could then result in different positive

outcomes:

improving performance and efficiency while reducing the global carbon footprint.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Animals (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Animals (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia Pais de publicación: Suiza