Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasonic Scalpel vs. Polymeric Clip Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy in Adolescents with Symptomatic Varicocele.
Pogorelic, Zenon; Poljak, Karlo; Jukic, Miro; Vukojevic, Katarina.
Afiliación
  • Pogorelic Z; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Poljak K; Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Jukic M; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
  • Vukojevic K; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia.
J Clin Med ; 13(15)2024 Jul 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39124589
ABSTRACT

Background:

The aim of this study was to investigate treatment outcomes in adolescents who underwent laparoscopic surgery with an ultrasonic scalpel for symptomatic varicocele compared with adolescents who underwent surgery with a polymer clip.

Methods:

A total of 270 adolescents with a median age of 16 (interquartile range, IQR 13-17) years were included in the study. Taking into account the laparoscopic varicocelectomy technique used, the patients were divided into two groups. In the first group (n = 151), a polymer clip was used, while in the second group (n = 119), an ultrasonic scalpel was used to resect the spermatic vessels. The primary outcome measure was the effect of the laparoscopic technique used on treatment outcomes (postoperative complications and recurrence rates). Secondary outcomes were the duration of surgery and anesthesia and the length of hospital stay.

Results:

The duration of the surgical procedure (12 min (IQR 11, 15) versus 15 min (12, 19), p = 0.029) and anesthesia (21.5 min (16, 29.5) versus 28 min (23, 34), p = 0.003) was shorter in the group of adolescents in whom laparoscopic varicocelectomy was performed with an ultrasonic scalpel than in the group in which a polymer clip was used. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups studied in terms of length of hospital stay, recurrence rate (p >0.999), and complications (p = 0.703). There were no cases of testicular atrophy in either group. In the group of patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy with an ultrasonic scalpel, a slightly higher incidence of hydroceles was found (n = 4, 3.4%) than in the group in which a polymer clip was used (n = 2, 1.3%) (p = 0.410). At six-month follow-up, it was found that the majority of patients showed moderate or significant improvement in the spermogram after laparoscopic varicocelectomy (n = 85, 89.5%). In addition, the subjective discomfort or pain disappeared in the majority of patients (n = 71, 93.4%). The testicular volume increased significantly in 132 adolescents (89.8%).

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy with a polymer clip or ultrasonic scalpel is safe and effective in adolescents with symptomatic varicocele. Treatment outcomes after laparoscopic varicocelectomy are the same regardless of whether a polymer clip or an ultrasonic scalpel is used to resect the spermatic vessels. The use of an ultrasonic scalpel for resection of the spermatic vessels shortens the overall duration of surgery and anesthesia.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Croacia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Croacia