Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Study Between Intravenous Esmolol and Oral Clonidine in Attenuating Hyperdynamic Cardiovascular Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation.
Mudiganti, V N K Srinivas; Murthy, Brig Tvsp; Kakara, Sneha; Iswarya, Mudiganti Raja Sri Jaya; R, Pratap; Singam, Amol Prakash; Jain, Abhishek.
Afiliación
  • Mudiganti VNKS; Critical Care Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital (AVBRH), Wardha, IND.
  • Murthy BT; Anesthesiology, GSL Medical College and General Hospital, Rajahmundry, IND.
  • Kakara S; Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry, IND.
  • Iswarya MRSJ; Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Command Hospital, Armed Forces Medical College (AFMC), Pune, IND.
  • R P; Anesthesiology, Army Hospital Research and Referral (R and R), Delhi, IND.
  • Singam AP; Cardiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Rajahmundry, IND.
  • Jain A; Radiology, Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Foundation, Amalapuram, IND.
Cureus ; 16(7): e64584, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144894
ABSTRACT
Background In today's era of anesthesia, balanced anesthesia is the main basis of patient care and pain management. Of all the medications given during general anesthesia, premedication, induction agents, and muscle relaxants play a major role in keeping the hemodynamics properly under control. When laryngoscopy is performed to intubate, a pain stimulus will be generated, leading to a rise in blood pressure and heart rate. This stimulus can be avoided without any complications if appropriate premedication is given to the patient at the appropriate dosage. In this research, we compare the influence of injection esmolol and oral clonidine during the time of induction as premedications to suppress the hemodynamic response. Material and methods In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 90 patients were divided into three groups Group E (esmolol) received 2 mg/kg IV esmolol diluted in 0.9% NS two minutes pre-anesthesia; Group C (clonidine) received oral clonidine 4 mcg/kg 90 minutes pre-anesthesia; and Group P (placebo) received IV normal saline and oral water. Blood pressure, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure were measured at baseline and seven subsequent time points. Results The study compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) changes over seven minutes in three groups, clonidine (Group C), placebo (Group P), and esmolol (Group E). At one minute, Group E showed a consistent MAP decrease from 95.21 mmHg to 85.92 mmHg, while Group C and Group P exhibited fluctuating trends. DBP decreased across all groups, with Group P ending highest (77.7 mmHg) and Group C lowest (66.8 mmHg). Group E's SBP decreased steadily from 126.2 mmHg to 118.0 mmHg, Group C decreased from 128 mmHg to 116.1 mmHg, and Group P showed more erratic fluctuations in SBP, DBP, and MAP. Conclusion These findings suggest that intravenous esmolol shows a good hemodynamic response having superior control over heart rate and getting the pressure under control quickly without major drop compared with the clonidine and placebo groups.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos