Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving social cognition following theta burst stimulation over the right inferior frontal gyrus in autism spectrum: an 8-week double-blind sham-controlled trial.
Ni, Hsing-Chang; Chen, Yi-Lung; Hsieh, Meng-Ying; Wu, Chen-Te; Chen, Rou-Shayn; Juan, Chi-Hung; Li, Cheng-Ta; Gau, Susan Shur-Fen; Lin, Hsiang-Yuan.
Afiliación
  • Ni HC; Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chen YL; College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hsieh MY; Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Wu CT; Department of Psychology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
  • Chen RS; Deparment of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Taipei, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Juan CH; Department of Pediatric Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Li CT; Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Gau SS; Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Lin HY; Institue of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan.
Psychol Med ; : 1-12, 2024 Sep 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39238103
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) is a potential beneficial brain stimulation target for autism. This randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, sham-controlled clinical trial assessed the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the RIFG in reducing autistic symptoms (NCT04987749).

METHODS:

Conducted at a single medical center, the trial enrolled 60 intellectually able autistic individuals (aged 8-30 years; 30 active iTBS). The intervention comprised 16 sessions (two stimulations per week for eight weeks) of neuro-navigated iTBS or sham over the RIFG. Fifty-seven participants (28 active) completed the intervention and assessments at Week 8 (the primary endpoint) and follow-up at Week 12.

RESULTS:

Autistic symptoms (primary outcome) based on the Social Responsiveness Scale decreased in both groups (significant time effect), but there was no significant difference between groups (null time-by-treatment interaction). Likewise, there was no significant between-group difference in changes in repetitive behaviors and exploratory outcomes of adaptive function and emotion dysregulation. Changes in social cognition (secondary outcome) differed between groups in feeling scores on the Frith-Happe Animations (Week 8, p = 0.026; Week 12, p = 0.025). Post-hoc analysis showed that the active group improved better on this social cognition than the sham group. Dropout rates did not vary between groups; the most common adverse event in both groups was local pain. Notably, our findings would not survive stringent multiple comparison corrections.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings suggest that iTBS over the RIFG is not different from sham in reducing autistic symptoms and emotion dysregulation. Nonetheless, RIFG iTBS may improve social cognition of mentalizing others' feelings in autistic individuals.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Reino Unido