Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography with transient elastography in adult nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Yamaguchi, Ruri; Oda, Tetsuro; Nagashima, Kengo.
Afiliación
  • Yamaguchi R; Department of Investigative Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryomachi, Aobaku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan. ruri.yamaguchi@med.tohoku.ac.jp.
  • Oda T; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagashima K; Biostatistics Unit, Clinical and Translational Research Center, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 2024 Sep 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240377
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To compare the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of shear wave elastography (SWE) to that of transient elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis grade assessment in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease adults.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criteria were primary studies examining DTA of TE, point SWE (pSWE), two-dimensional SWE (2D-SWE), or magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) with liver biopsy. Network meta-analysis was conducted using a Bayesian bivariate mixed-effects model.

RESULTS:

For fibrosis grade 2 or higher, 15 studies with 25 observations (16 observations for TE, 1 for MRE, 4 for pSWE and 2D-SWE; 2,066 patients) were included; the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (95% credible interval (CrI) 0.70-0.86; 95% prediction interval (PI) 0.36-0.96) and 0.73 (95% CrI 0.62-0.82; 95% PI 0.23-0.96) for TE, 0.68 (95% CrI 0.48-0.83; 95% PI 0.23-0.94) and 0.75 (95% CrI 0.53-0.88; 95% PI 0.24-0.97) for pSWE, 0.85 (95% CrI 0.70-0.93; 95% PI 0.40-0.98) and 0.72 (95% CrI 0.49-0.86; 95% PI 0.20-0.96) for 2D-SWE, respectively. The proportion of studies classified as unclear in QUADAS-2 was high, and the results were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSION:

2D-SWE could be recommended as TE is for liver fibrosis assessment. The protocol of this systematic review and network meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022327249). All included primary papers have already been published and the information and data can be used freely.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos