Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stent vs Stent-Less Ileal Conduits After Radical Cystectomy: Is There a Difference in Early Postoperative Outcomes?
Shah, Mihir S; Hochberg, Aaron R; Prebay, Zachary J; Shah, Yash B; Im, Brian H; Simhal, Rishabh K; Givner, Daniel; Wang, Kerith R; Simon, Daniel P; Mark, J Ryan; Metwalli, Adam R; Lallas, Costas D.
Afiliación
  • Shah MS; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Hochberg AR; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Prebay ZJ; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Shah YB; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Im BH; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Simhal RK; Department of Urology at Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  • Givner D; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Wang KR; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Simon DP; Department of Urology, Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Mark JR; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Metwalli AR; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lallas CD; Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Urol Pract ; : 101097UPJ0000000000000702, 2024 Sep 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240682
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Placing ureteral stents at the uretero-ileal anastomosis for radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (RCIC) has long been common practice. Recently, some providers have begun omitting stents. We sought to investigate differences in perioperative and 30-day outcomes between patients who underwent radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (RCIC) with and without stents placed at the uretero-ileal anastomosis.

METHODS:

We identified RCICs performed between 2019 to 2021 in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and corresponding Cystectomy-Targeted Participant Use File. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and operative parameters were compared via Pearson's chi-square and t-tests between stented and stent-less RCICs. Outcomes of interest, including rates of urinary tract infections (UTIs), acute kidney injury (AKI), renal failure requiring dialysis, ileoileal anastomotic leaks, ureteral obstruction, urinary leak or fistula formation, reoperations, and 30-day hospital readmissions were compared using Pearson's chi-square. All statistical tests were 2 tailed with P < .05 considered significant.

RESULTS:

Five Thousand Four Hundred Eighteen RCICs were identified. Four hundred ninety-eight (9.2%) were stent-less. There were no differences in baseline demographics or comorbidities. Significantly fewer stented patients had robotic-assisted operations (23% vs 29%, P < .01). Stented patients had lower rates of urinary leak or fistula formation (3.1% vs 4.8%, P = .04). There was no significant difference in 30-day rates of UTIs, AKIs, renal failure, ileoileal anastomotic leaks, ureteral obstruction, reoperations, and readmissions. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of longitudinal tracking past 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

Stent-less patients had non-inferior outcomes compared to stented patients in most important 30-day outcomes. Our analysis suggests that stents may not be necessary in ileal conduit urinary diversion procedures.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Urol Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos