Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A global systematic map of knowledge of inland commercial navigation effects on freshwater ecosystems.
Jeliazkov, Alienor; Martínez-Fernández, Vanesa; Altanov, Vassil Y; Beisel, Jean-Nicolas; Buijse, Anthonie Dirk; Consuegra, Sofia; Felin, Swann; Garcia de Leaniz, Carlos; Graf, Wolfram; He, Fengzhi; Jähnig, Sonja C; Leitner, Patrick; Schmidt-Kloiber, Astrid; Sexton, Aaron N; Staentzel, Cybill; Tales, Evelyne; Wantzen, Karl M; Wolter, Christian.
Afiliación
  • Jeliazkov A; University of Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Hydrosystems under changes, France. Electronic address: alienor.jeliazkov@gmail.com.
  • Martínez-Fernández V; Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, E.T.S. Ingeniería de Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: vanesa.mfernandez@gmail.com.
  • Altanov VY; Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.
  • Beisel JN; Université de Strasbourg, ENGEES, CNRS, LIVE, UMR, 7362, F-67000, Strasbourg, France.
  • Buijse AD; Wageningen University & Research, Aquaculture and Fisheries group, Wageningen, the Netherlands; Deltares, Department of Freshwater Ecology and Water Quality, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Consuegra S; Swansea University, Department of BioSciences, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  • Felin S; University of Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Hydrosystems under changes, France.
  • Garcia de Leaniz C; Swansea University, Department of BioSciences, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
  • Graf W; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
  • He F; Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany; Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Jähnig SC; Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany; Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Leitner P; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
  • Schmidt-Kloiber A; University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management, Gregor Mendel Strasse 33, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sexton AN; Fondation pour la recherche sur la biodiversité-Centre de Synthèse et d'Analyse sur la Biodiversité, Montpellier, France.
  • Staentzel C; Université de Strasbourg, ENGEES, CNRS, LIVE, UMR, 7362, F-67000, Strasbourg, France.
  • Tales E; University of Paris-Saclay, INRAE, HYCAR Hydrosystems under changes, France.
  • Wantzen KM; UNESCO Chair "Fleuves et Patrimoine", CNRS UMRS CITERES, Tours University, Tours, and CNRS UMR LIVE, Strasbourg University, 37000, France.
  • Wolter C; Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany.
J Environ Manage ; 370: 122474, 2024 Sep 21.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39307090
ABSTRACT
Inland navigation is one of the most sustainable transport alternatives to help decarbonise the world economy. However, the likely impacts of intensifying inland navigation on freshwater ecosystems are difficult to predict. A global map of knowledge that considers both abiotic and biotic responses to increasing shipping traffic and developing infrastructures is lacking. Deriving general evidence-based assessments is challenging, because most studies on inland navigation impacts are merely descriptive and either consist of local case studies, or address single navigation stressors or specific taxa only. We conducted a systematic mapping of the published literature (1908-2021) to provide a global synthesis of the effects of inland navigation on the biotic and abiotic components of freshwater ecosystems. We show that only half of the reported navigation-related impacts were statistically tested. Navigation itself (vessel operation) had mainly negative effects on native taxa (57%), followed by waterway management (40%), and navigation infrastructures (35%). Navigation has direct negative impacts caused by physical disturbances such as vessel-induced waves, and indirect impacts that facilitate the spread of aquatic invasive species, and altering the abiotic habitat conditions. Thirty percent of the tested relationships showed non-significant impacts on the biotic environment, while in 10% of cases impacts were context-dependent. We identified the main gaps of knowledge, namely (i) impacts of waterway management on communities, (ii) underlying processes of navigation impacts on river ecosystems; and (iii) interactions between multiple navigation factors and cascading effects on multi-taxa responses. These future research directions should improve the diagnosis, mitigate the negative impacts of navigation on rivers and provide guidelines for improving navigated river management.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido