Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Subjective and objective assessment of image quality--a comparison.
Good, W F; Gur, D; Feist, J H; Thaete, F L; Fuhrman, C R; Britton, C A; Slasky, B S.
Afiliación
  • Good WF; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261-0001.
J Digit Imaging ; 7(2): 77-8, 1994 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8075187
ABSTRACT
Forced-choice just noticeable difference (JND) studies are extremely sensitive to image quality variations that are below the threshold at which the differences are apparent to or definable by the observer. Paired comparisons of 4K and 2K laser-printed posteroanterior chest images consistently demonstrated that although images are viewed as comparable by radiologists, when forced to choose the better ("sharper") image, they actually select the higher-resolution images in 83% of the paired observations. We conclude that small differences in image quality may be detectable even in image sets which are considered to be comparable by subjective assessments.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía Torácica / Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica / Variaciones Dependientes del Observador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Digit Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / INFORMATICA MEDICA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 1994 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía Torácica / Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica / Variaciones Dependientes del Observador Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Digit Imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / INFORMATICA MEDICA / RADIOLOGIA Año: 1994 Tipo del documento: Article
...