A comparison of two skin preps used in cardiac surgical procedures.
AORN J
; 62(3): 393-402, 1995 Sep.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-8534058
Postoperative surgical site infections contribute significantly to increased patient morbidity and mortality rates and unnecessary hospital costs. Effective and efficient preoperative patient skin preparation is an important perioperative nursing intervention that decreases the number of wound contaminants and reduces the risks for postoperative surgical site infections. This study examined the effectiveness and time and material costs of two preoperative patient skin prep methods (ie, isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor-impregnated adhesive drape method, iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method). The isopropyl alcohol prep/iodophor-impregnated adhesive drape method clinically was as effective as the iodophor scrub and paint prep/plain adhesive drape method, more cost-effective when time and materials were compared, and less cost-effective when materials alone were compared. To make appropriate decisions about the use of preoperative patient skin prep methods, perioperative nurse managers and staff members need to examine and determine whether costs in time or materials have the greater impact on their surgical settings.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Premedicación
/
Ropa de Protección
/
Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica
/
1-Propanol
/
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos
/
Yodóforos
Tipo de estudio:
Health_economic_evaluation
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
AORN J
Año:
1995
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos
Pais de publicación:
Estados Unidos